falconeight
New member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 188
- 0
- 0
If we are concerned with the competition, it carries into the company's goals and we get better products. IMO -.-
Then why don't they sell? Why did microsoft have to write of the surface rt 1?
If we are concerned with the competition, it carries into the company's goals and we get better products. IMO -.-
It would be a hit and apple will be lauded by some for "innovating" and criticized by others for copying. Not that different now with what they're doing, just look at the latest features of iOS and the notification center.
I agree with WillysJeepMan, Jobs created marketshare and demand, now they seem to be playing it safe. They keep promising that great products are in the pipelines.
I like apple it does have great products, but I also look for a product that best fits my need and not what logo is on the back![]()
1. It's the most innovative product ever. True genius
2. The media would tell you to go out and sell your Macbook and iPad so that you could upgrade to this. You only need one device
3. lololol MS Losers
4. Look at me take notes. I'm so much more freaking creative than any of you lowly peasants
5. 10,000+ compatible accessories will be launched by many companies at launch
6. lololol Google Losers
7. 2 million apps will be produced within the next 12 months
8. Duh! This was such an obvious idea. But only Apple was brave enough to try.
9. If I buy this, I might get laid
10. I liked Surface before it was cool
If apple released the SP3
1. Lines would wrap around cities, some would get to buy...others just hoping for a glimpse
2. The keyboard is great, and Apple has given consumers the option to buy it separately rather than packaging it. Thats the beauty of Surface, if you dont want the kb, it will perform superbly with its beautiful screen.
3. You can hold it up for hours reading books
4. While microsoft will be chasing the 8 inch market, apple has once again rewriting history in another category.
5. The Verge: The lapabilty is amazing.
I have been wondering why Microsoft released the SP3 when they did. It didn't make sense with respect to the SP2, or the projection of the availability of the new Broadwell chip. But it was about a 1/2 generation before Apple debuts new hardware. There are persistent rumors of a 12" Macbook Air and a larger screen (than iPad Air) iPad Pro. I think that there is a good possibility of both these devices being released this Fall. If so, then it will show that Apple is looking to continue to produce no-compromise ultrabooks and tablets rather than hybrids.
Having just traded in my Surface 2 for a new 11.6" Macbook Air, I'm back to having the netbook experience I need as well as the tablet (via my iPad 4) in a very portable package.
In this post-Jobs Apple, it is difficult to say whether or not Apple will continue to deliver. But I must say that the MBA is pretty excellent and Microsoft will have a difficult time going toe-to-toe with Apple if they're going to continue down the hybrid path.
I can see Microsoft adjusting the Surface to be more ultrabook than tablet. They could modify the way that the keyboard cover attaches to the Surface... a physical mechanism similar to the ones used in hybrids by Asus and Acer. And they can include the TypeCover in with the Surface itself for the current base price.
Those two additions would help the Surface make inroads with road warriors and others looking for a premium ultra portable ultrabook experience. That could buy them time for the app store to grow.
As far as the price of software, that is going to depend on what you want to do with either machine. Office is an extra expense on either.
I'm talking in the sense of getting work done. iWork might work for truly personal use, but even when you get into education Office is mostly standard. In the corporate world, it's not even a question.You're forgetting that Apple allows you to download iWork (Pages, Numbers and Keynote) for free with every new Mac. You could argue that iWork is not a full fledged Office replacement, but as far as a regular consumer is concerned, they are both the same thing, and work in the same way...
iPad is just an oversized iPhone? Did I just step into a time machine and go back to 2010? What's next, "iPad? iPad?! what kind of name is THAT?! Sounds like a feminine hygiene product"?iPad Pro? Just another oversized iPhone. I don't see the advantage.
Lets face it the hardware has gotten much more advanced then the OS though what else is new....
I remember when the first rumors of the first iPad were circulating on the net. I saw images of a tablet running OSX. Well we all
know what was actually released, just an over sized iPhone, which I was totally disappointed.
iPad is just an oversized iPhone? Did I just step into a time machine and go back to 2010? What's next, "iPad? iPad?! what kind of name is THAT?! Sounds like a feminine hygiene product"?
Granted, for many people the things that people use the iPad for can be done on an iPhone. But for others, the iPad offers a platform that is not limited to media consumption but content creation as well.
What professional software is available for Windows tablets that rivals Boss Jock Studio for the iPad (for podcast recording/production)? Since the iPad is just an oversized iPhone you should have no difficulty finding them. Will your response be, "well, that's an exception case"?
I understand his point. It was to dismiss the usefulness of a tablet running a touch OS. My reference to Windows tablet apps was a comparative... to show by comparison that Windows tablets are further behind in "usefulness" than something that is an oversized iPhone.Boss jock studio is also available on the iphone... You are only helping his argument.
I also don't understand why you are asking about apps on a windows tablet when the statement was that an iPad is an oversized iPhone. Me thinks you don't quite understand the argument.