As mentioned GG2 and GG3's difference on lies in the physical properties of the displays, the weight and thickness. They are still equally more, or less prone to damage.
AMOLED displays are very expensive to produce, and start to get really expensive on displays larger than 5 inches, that is why we don't see any TV's with AMOLED technology, not even 15 inch laptops use AMOLED, to my knowledge.
Anyways AMOLED has it drawbacks. My 1020 has a couple of black blotches on the screen noticeable on the settings menu where there is a black background, but this is normal for any AMOLED display, its the way they are manufactured. Very noticeable on Samsung AMOLEDS.
LCD consumes less energy than AMOELD, I thought it was the other way round but if you are displaying a lot of colours on a display, then an LCD consumes less energy, which will make a big difference on a full HD 6 inch display.
And at the end of the day, if Nokia did decide to have the 1520 with an AMOLED display and GG3, it would push the price up even more.
Yes, but I thought Glance was about saving battery because of only turning on pixels that need to be displayed (a la AMOLED). I assume this is similar in feature to the Moto X's notification feature.no it doesnt make glance pointless. if you notice, glance is very dim. amoled and lcd both get dim. that is not specific to a display tech.
Yes, but I thought Glance was about saving battery because of only turning on pixels that need to be displayed (a la AMOLED). I assume this is similar in feature to the Moto X's notification feature.
I have not noticed how dim it is because, well, I don't think I have access to Glance on a 521. Just sharing my concerns.
I was shocked to see Lumia 1520 having Gorilla Glass 2 instead of 3 and LCD instead of AMOLED. 6 inch is a big screen, therefore will be more vulnurable to damage if falls. You need a stronger glass for a big screen
That's how the world goes. Why would someone make new generation worst than the previous generation?
AT&T will get a AMOLED on its 1520. But they omitted wireless charging and only include 16GB of internal storage. Also the SoC is 0.1GHz faster than the global version. For me those are all negatives. I like LCD better than over saturated AMOLED screens. Internal storage is much better than using a SD card. I have three wireless charger that I would like to use without adding a cover. WP doesn't need a faster SoC, 2.2GHz is plenty fast.I was shocked to see Lumia 1520 having Gorilla Glass 2 instead of 3 and LCD instead of AMOLED. 6 inch is a big screen, therefore will be more vulnurable to damage if falls. You need a stronger glass for a big screen
AMOLED screens is brighter, has a better contrast (LCDs have been stuck with 1000:1 for ages), 180 deg. viewing angle, better screen response time (~0.01ms), lacks of uneven backlight, is thinner overall (no backlight needed), result in a better power consumption, when it comes to a black Windows Phone UI, so the difference is pretty obvious. However AMOLED screens are more expensive and the suppliers of AMOLED screens are limited because of a more advanced manufacturing process, there is a reason, we must choose between a screen resolution and AMOLED technology. It's the same as it was with 920/925. When the prices will drop, we will see a 1080p AMOLED Lumia, it's just a matter of time. I don't think there is too many people waiting for the two times overpriced phone just because of a screen matrix type. AMOLEDs are also believed to be fade more quick, but there is doubt it will affect a phone life cycle.Do people really notice the difference between AMOLED and LCD?
That's how the world goes. Why would someone make new generation worst than the previous generation?
It was. And it's no way related to the phone specs.Vista came out after XP.
Therefore Vista HAS to be greater than XP. That's how the world goes, right?
The thing that hurts me the most is the 20MP camera with Dual LED Flash.
Its almost the same story as GG2 vs GG3.. you won't even notice the difference. BUT WHY?!
Why didn't they just put the same camera from 1020 with Xenon flash (which I think is WAY better than LED)?
I also (for some unknown reason) prefer AMOLED, it just feels like it's better than LCD even tho I don't know almost anything about displays.
But anyway, I guess I'll still have to wait for Nokia(Microsoft) to get a hold of themselves and make a superphone (or a phablet).
A phone which will be the best of the best.
I agree, I constantly fear that my screen will burn inFor me LCD is a plus over amoled. Either way I hope Verizon gets this phone pretty soon.
...Phonemakers have been quietly moving away from GG3 for a while, and I believe that Corning has already shown off its replacement pretty early in the lifecycle. Corning screwed up and GG3 is pretty widely regarded as NOT being as durable as GG2. In their quest for thinness and lightness, they sacrificed some quality and strength. A lot of the early GG3 phones had complaints about scratching and imperfections...