- Apr 17, 2012
- 1,303
- 0
- 0
I've heard theories from certain apologists that MS never intended to sell mega-millions of Surface RT, that it was just to "spur on" innovation from Windows OEMs to make better hardware. However, how can a total sales BOMB do that? Wouldn't the more logical outcome be - "well that thing totally bombed and was rejected by the consumer, why should we take any inspiration from it whatsoever". That is the sane, clear, and sober take on that. Surface RT/2 has fundamental flaws that make it a no-buy for consumers:
- wrong aspect ratio(4:3 is apparently the golden ratio here)
- confusing/ugly GUI
- no apps
- MS horrible reputation. People work all day long on Windows XP/7 machine and want to un-wind/relax with non-MS product. I know this for a fact.
- wrong aspect ratio(4:3 is apparently the golden ratio here)
- confusing/ugly GUI
- no apps
- MS horrible reputation. People work all day long on Windows XP/7 machine and want to un-wind/relax with non-MS product. I know this for a fact.