[jkrc717]

the L900 has a beautiful screen and sure looks like HD to me. Wonder how much better the L920 is.

[mlm1950]

A lot.

[MAERSK]

...and by "a lot" he means, a lot.

[pdjcrawford]

...and he speaketh the truth.

[jsgiv]

Side by side though the 900 is a bit greasy.

[jsgiv]

Side by side though the 900 is a bit greasy.

[jkrc717]

I do see a difference, but theres all kinds of finger prints on the 900 in that video.

I don't see a "big" difference or alot of the difference thats been mentioned.

I really hope this is true because the HD screen was the deal breaker for me and I'll be disappointed if I switched to ATT for something not even worth it.

[ncxcstud]

Its a better size (subjective yes, but I want a larger display). 4.3 inches.to 4.5.

Higher resolution 480x800 to 768x1280.

Denser PPI 217 to 332

Stronger display gorilla glass 1 vs. Gorilla glass 2

Not to mention the higher refresh rate, clearblack tech, and the ability to use any glove with thebdisplay.

Yes, the 920s display is A LOT better than the 900.

[hasasimo]

I do see a difference, but theres all kinds of finger prints on the 900 in that video.

I don't see a "big" difference or alot of the difference thats been mentioned.

I really hope this is true because the HD screen was the deal breaker for me and I'll be disappointed if I switched to ATT for something not even worth it.

Don't forget that the 900 has no oleophobic coating, making it a fingerprint magnent. If the 920 has the same coating that the 800 had, that alone will make the display better to the average person, especially outdoors.