I'll give them a little credit. They did state they were biased at the very beginning of the article.
I think that was the only fact in the article!
I'll give them a little credit. They did state they were biased at the very beginning of the article.
But then they follow that up by saying " But before we go rushing to judgments or conclusions, let's compare the two tablets and see how they really fare against each other."
I am also suspicious that the 1.3 GHz A7 can outperform the 1.7 GHz Tegra 4 but it may be so (the 64 bits, that they keep harping on gives them nothing).
View attachment 47744
I like how he didn't bother to remove the red wavy lines. Is this guy too lazy or doesn't he know how to do it?
Dont read any article about WP or RT generally just avoid techradar!
I read there thoughts about the 1520 they call it a hand warming with unnecessary specs however techradar on other reviews and article complained about WP and Nokia for not having 1080p display, quad cores, the latest SoC, 2GB of RAM now they have it, it becomes useless and pointless!
You mean Tech Radar is biased?
The Verge also said the iPad Air would have a place in their backpack (you know, without actually having used one for an extended period of time), but said the Surface 2 would not in their review. So yeah....
I journalist from Silicon Valley wrote two weeks ago that having a Lumia phone in public is a source of derision.
It is a wonderful machine, and it's a shame that it's so misunderstood by the press
It's reported here Microsoft sighs with relief: Ballmer's off, Surface tabs selling, profit up ?€? The Register that the original Surface RT is starting to sell well (search page for 32GB to find it). No numbers, unfortunately, at least in that report, but maybe things are looking up for WinRT.