- Mar 1, 2011
- 6,913
- 93
- 48
So I'm watching The Verge's review for the Go 2 and it didn't take long before he asked the inevitable question, can it run Photoshop?
They never ask, can it run Affinity? They never show if it can handle a large spreadsheet. They never talk about the hundreds of thousands of apps that aren't Photoshop that run fine on a low powered Windows Machine. Instead, they want to see how low specced machines - machines that clearly weren't designed for the task they're trying to accomplish - how it handles really intense programs. Can it run Photoshop is Microsoft's version of "Can it run Crysis?"
Side note: I ran Affinity on the Go 2, connected to an external display, and didn’t have any problems with a few layers on a 1080p image.
A big reason why I choose the Go is because I never know what sort of app a vendor will need me to install. I can’t risk being caught flat footed with Chrome OS or an iPad. But I also don’t want to lug around my gigantic laptop when I’m traveling between locations. That's where something like the Go 2 fits in perfectly.
I've made the not-so-difficult decision to replace my Pro 7 (i3) with my Go 2 (m3). The Go 2 is the best of both worlds (Windows, portability, flexibility, file management). I tried the Go 1 but it struggled too much with Google Sheets. I upgraded to the Pro 7 but it is just a hair too big. Especially post-work when I’m just chilling on the couch. If you don’t do heavy photo/video editing, or game, there is so much you can do with that m3.
But tech blogs have this desire to take some of the most resource intensive programs (i.e. the programs they use) and judge devices based on how well they do. That leaves out an entire universe of people that don't need Photoshop.
Photoshop/Premiere is a bad way to judge a devices performance or usefulness.
There is some weird narrative that everyone has 30 Chrome tabs open while watching two 4K videos on two separate external monitors. Not everyone is a power user. I'd say most people aren't. It would be nice if reviewers focused on the actual capabilities of the hardware and not the hardware they want it to be.
They never ask, can it run Affinity? They never show if it can handle a large spreadsheet. They never talk about the hundreds of thousands of apps that aren't Photoshop that run fine on a low powered Windows Machine. Instead, they want to see how low specced machines - machines that clearly weren't designed for the task they're trying to accomplish - how it handles really intense programs. Can it run Photoshop is Microsoft's version of "Can it run Crysis?"
Side note: I ran Affinity on the Go 2, connected to an external display, and didn’t have any problems with a few layers on a 1080p image.
A big reason why I choose the Go is because I never know what sort of app a vendor will need me to install. I can’t risk being caught flat footed with Chrome OS or an iPad. But I also don’t want to lug around my gigantic laptop when I’m traveling between locations. That's where something like the Go 2 fits in perfectly.
I've made the not-so-difficult decision to replace my Pro 7 (i3) with my Go 2 (m3). The Go 2 is the best of both worlds (Windows, portability, flexibility, file management). I tried the Go 1 but it struggled too much with Google Sheets. I upgraded to the Pro 7 but it is just a hair too big. Especially post-work when I’m just chilling on the couch. If you don’t do heavy photo/video editing, or game, there is so much you can do with that m3.
But tech blogs have this desire to take some of the most resource intensive programs (i.e. the programs they use) and judge devices based on how well they do. That leaves out an entire universe of people that don't need Photoshop.
Photoshop/Premiere is a bad way to judge a devices performance or usefulness.
There is some weird narrative that everyone has 30 Chrome tabs open while watching two 4K videos on two separate external monitors. Not everyone is a power user. I'd say most people aren't. It would be nice if reviewers focused on the actual capabilities of the hardware and not the hardware they want it to be.