It seems as though that is a standard answer when banning someone for banning because they use something in thier post. Somehow, this standard on following "banned because..." with "banned for not.." is a merry-go-round of some strange unwritten "must do when having been done" rule is applied. As I feel this is a unproven need on this thread, I feel we must break this cycle, free the bonds, realease thebans, and be outside the box.
What I am trying to say is you are stinking banned for a stock reply. Get back to the drawing board, Qwark. Somewhere else then here. For you are banned.