Cnet tests 8X, 920, iP5 cameras

I think iPhone photos are sharper and better contrasted, however in low-light condition Nokia takes the lead.
I am actually disappointed with Lumia 920's camera, i expected sharper images in the day light.
 
There are too many inconsistent comparisons of these phone cameras on the Internet. I wonder if an actual photography site has done reviews or comparisons on this.
 
They should do a video comparison next. I wonder how good the OIS on the iPhone or 8x is.
 
There are too many inconsistent comparisons of these phone cameras on the Internet. I wonder if an actual photography site has done reviews or comparisons on this.

I'm pretty sure you saw this aubreyq, but for those that haven't:

This is the most competent Lumia 920 camera comparison I've seen so far. Jessica Dolcourt from cnet (actually anyone from cnet) is simply clueless in comparison. They simply lack the knowledge to review anything technical.
 
I'm pretty sure you saw this aubreyq, but for those that haven't:

This is the most competent Lumia 920 camera comparison I've seen so far. Jessica Dolcourt from cnet (actually anyone from cnet) is simply clueless in comparison. They simply lack the knowledge to review anything technical.
Actually I had not seen it. That was a good test. I'm looking forward to seeing their 8X camera testing, however I doubt it'll be superior to the 920's.

Thanks for the link!!
 
Seems like the Iphone 5 is most consistent, with the Lumia offering unnatural colors and blur but exceeding in the dark and the 8X offering great pictures but chocking most of the time..
 
The iPhone 5 camera looks like trash without a well lit envronment. And the video camera is equal levels of suck.
 
To be honest, this is the way we should get the picture reviews. As normal people take it, no everyone has the time or knowledge to use the settings. They just want to focus, shoot and get a good picture.
 
To be honest, this is the way we should get the picture reviews. As normal people take it, no everyone has the time or knowledge to use the settings. They just want to focus, shoot and get a good picture.

People who couldn't be bothered to use cameras correctly, probably don't really care about picture quality either, so I don't see why tests should cater to the lowest competency level of humanity.

Nevertheless, the review I linked to did include one test to simulate a clueless user. I think that is a fair compromise.
 
To be honest, this is the way we should get the picture reviews. As normal people take it, no everyone has the time or knowledge to use the settings. They just want to focus, shoot and get a good picture.
Yeah, because holding the phone and waiting one more second to push the button AND mind what you are doing takes to much work and knowledge. Yeah. I forgot. That is not what normal people should do.
 
People who couldn't be bothered to use cameras correctly, probably don't really care about picture quality either, so I don't see why tests should cater to the lowest competency level of humanity.

Nevertheless, the review I linked to did include one test to simulate a clueless user. I think that is a fair compromise.
I, in NO way, am a professional photographer or have taken one single class in photography.

I just happen to have this little thing called "common sense" and some interest in how things I do come out.

That has helped me get better pictures with my phone.

If someone can not do that, they certainly have the lowest competency level of humanity.

:)
 
People take crappy pictures, I had a friend with an Iphone 4 and she kept complaining about the crappy camera, I was taking photos with my Optimus 7 and she love how the pictures look. (Well she did had a GS2 before the iphone, is very hard not to take a great picture with that phone)
 
There are too many inconsistent comparisons of these phone cameras on the Internet. I wonder if an actual photography site has done reviews or comparisons on this.
The point of the comparisons is to show you what sort of image quality that the average consumer will be producing. Sure, someone with experience/interest/time will be able to manipulate the settings on any of these devices to produce some amazing shots, but most folks who are interesting in smartphones for their cameras are interested in their ability to quickly take "point and shoot"-type images. That's why the CNet article praised the consistency of the iPhone5.
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
343,239
Messages
2,266,320
Members
428,900
Latest member
YeOldRam