anon(5928073)
New member
- Apr 25, 2013
- 169
- 0
- 0
Microsofties clearly value their personal logic over market realities. Sinofsky clearly wasn't the only one living in his own little world some light years away from Earth. Heck, some Microsoft execs actually think a Lumia is labelled as "Nokia Lumia XXX running on Microsoft Windows Phone 8 dot one"), *NO ONE SAYS THAT, Microsoft!!*
Seriously, I have to ask, are they actually void of real business development people? How the heck do you *intentionally* miss enterprise on Windows Phone 7 when you had all the groundwork on Windows Mobile? How the heck do you make a platform that at one point was incapable of supporting modern mobile games when you have Xbox? How on heck do you agree to propose always online when the internet roared NO at the leaks? How do you not introduce compelling budget-friendly Windows Phone when the Lumia 520 was your best flyer?
Microsoft unable (or is unwilling) to read the market.
Anyways, the market has clearly moved towards the paradigm where the smartphone is basically a PC in your pocket (i.e. Android). Users have grown accustomed to (whether they like it or not) to see apps run fully in the background, to access many parts of the OS, to customize, to hook up peripherals such as full keyboards and mice, etc.
Is this the best solution to mobile? Perhaps not, but it's clearly where the market is headed, and with Android's 70-90%+ marketshare the expectation is that vendors (of apps, peripherals, etc) will build their ideas and solutions around Android's paradigm. If Microsoft is serious about getting Windows Phone some traction, it needs to alter Windows Phones to meet the general expectations and beliefs of developers, vendors and OEMs. This should have been achieved with Windows Phone 8, but no, Microsoft decided to stick with its personal worldview and utterly screw up, again, for the umpteenth time.
Just like how Microsoft managed to step away from its paradigm and transition Windows Mobile to the touch-friendly, full-screen Windows Phone, it needs to grow up (seriously...) and transition Windows Phone to basically Windows in a Phone. Think of it as, instead of forcing the user to grow up to the phone (i.e. Android), you let the phone grow with the user, like a friend or partner (i.e. Windows Phone). You make Windows Phone the companion, for everything in your life, and you depend on it take on bigger and more complex tasks if and when the time comes.
Take the Android model and offer a different sub-paradigm. Perhaps instead of exposing everything about the OS and burdening the user with a lot of work in organizing their phone, start out with a pre-set system and leave the extra power to those who have the minds to find and use it (e.g. enthusiasts). Perhaps revamp the Windows Phone Store model and have real professionals ensuring that spam and crap doesn't get through. Perhaps listen to what the market is telling you and not rush to create your own File Manager app after 3+ third party developers beat you to it.
Goodness sake Microsoft, GROW UP.
....and for the sake for all that is rational, introduce a mid-end Lumia with the specs of Moto G but with LTE and a PureView camera for $300-350 already. Come on.
This has to be one of the most well thought out responses to a forum post I have ever seen. I love it. All of the points stated here are valid. I really DO think Windows is very good at catching up and the OS is awesome, but it could be way better.. I mean WAY better. Its not the fact that being late is better than never, its the fact that being late has caused them to throw out half-baked OS updates.
Sure 8.1 seems like a full-fledged update, but that's because they put themselves in a place where they NEEDED to push an update like this or the platform would be dead. The product is still very good, but if you need to push updates with that much in them... that's where it gets concerning. Look at android for example, how big of an update was 4.4 to 4.4.2? Barely anything, but it improved the user experience and made the OS much smoother. They are ahead of they game so they don't need to improve much every time they push an update.
Finally. The worst thing you can say is "oh the platform has only been introduced "X" amount of years ago". No... please don't. They knew the market that they had to compete with.. They are just introducing controls for separate music and notification volumes, AND Skype barely even works like a native app.. C'mon... Thank you Blizkh for that thoughtful post.
.... And yes. They should introduce phones with specs like that, at that price point... But instead they have a low-end, a kind of low-end and a really high end... Not the smartest idea I've ever heard of.
