cj-m
New member
that is one of the reasons i like WP, i find the iOs and Android screens very cluttered with a gazillion little icons all over the place.
WP is simplified in a good way.
WP is simplified in a good way.
I am just wondering what took them two years to get there....
Deja vu? That's what happened with copy/paste and a couple of other features as well...takes MS a Veeerryyyyy*takes a small nap*yyyyyyy long to figure out something so small.
Sent from my RaZr NeXus.
Why does this still come up? Those tiles are bigger with no additional features, there's no white space because there's no gutter, and fewer tiles fit on the screen.
Come on, let's hear a real argument.
Those who like the new start screen - you simply don't care about having white space.
That's not a bad thing, but stop trying to pitch your opinion as fact - it's objective that white space is missing on the home screen, and both Android and iOS are now doing a better job of balancing out home screens.
No one is against small tiles or more customization. With the giant screens of the future, I highly doubt the option for the gutter will severely impact on the usability of small tiles.
There was no reason to drop the gutter other than succumbing to the tech press who spend their days flashing custom ROMs onto their non-stock Android devices. Truly does seem like Microsoft lost sight of the plan, and I'm worried that they will go further. Cluttered Metro is quite possibly the worst UI currently.
I don't think there's anything subjective about "absence of white space".
It's great that some love the start screen, but going in every thread where people might be discontent and saying you like it... it can come across as snobbery. "I got what I wanted, haha, why you so mad?" Really, no one should be celebrating when a feature or aspect is removed. What's to say that the next time, it won't be something that you personally value?
You might prefer function over form (I'd argue it's weird you're with Windows Phone if that is the case), but it doesn't hurt you in the slightest if there's an option. I've yet to see a legitimate reason why the complete removal of the gutter is in any way beneficial.
Click to view quoted image
EDIT: that said, I'll probably be putting down money on a new Lumia anyway. The 16:9 aspect ratio eases up the horizontal-vs-vertical awkwardness of the full-width home screen and the physical design seems too good to pass up on. Really curious what they are doing with the rest of the home screen though, being balanced on left and right would indicate swiping working in both directions.
I don't think there's anything subjective about "absence of white space".
It's great that some love the start screen, but going in every thread where people might be discontent and saying you like it... it can come across as snobbery. "I got what I wanted, haha, why you so mad?" Really, no one should be celebrating when a feature or aspect is removed. What's to say that the next time, it won't be something that you personally value?
You might prefer function over form (I'd argue it's weird you're with Windows Phone if that is the case), but it doesn't hurt you in the slightest if there's an option. I've yet to see a legitimate reason why the complete removal of the gutter is in any way beneficial.
Click to view quoted image
EDIT: that said, I'll probably be putting down money on a new Lumia anyway. The 16:9 aspect ratio eases up the horizontal-vs-vertical awkwardness of the full-width home screen and the physical design seems too good to pass up on. Really curious what they are doing with the rest of the home screen though, being balanced on left and right would indicate swiping working in both directions.
You might prefer function over form (I'd argue it's weird you're with Windows Phone if that is the case), but it doesn't hurt you in the slightest if there's an option. I've yet to see a legitimate reason why the complete removal of the gutter is in any way beneficial.
Or, they could have made it "metro" and had the arrow wrap off the side of the screen slightly just like the text at the top of just about every app.
Sorry but adding an inch of screen size to keep the gutter foes not "debunk" anything. Horrible argument.
You clearly missed the point of my argument, which was that our devices are getting larger and larger, and the gutter really isn't that big of a deal usability wise when we are hitting the high end of 4". With the gutter on new Ativ S, you'd get a hit target that is perfectly identical to the hit target owners of the Optimus 7 are going to have to deal with. The naysayers have said "it would be impossible to touch the small tiles with the gutter". I just proved otherwise, unless you're saying that WP8 will be unusable on <4".Can we have the same example given with identical screen sizes, please?
Oh, that's right. So we don't have a no-compromise solution for the old WP7 look. Nice of you to let me know.Well, if you want more tiles to fit, it's quite simple - you resize them.
The amount of white space on an iOS or Android home screen versus the amount of white space on a WP8 home screen is not subjective or opinion. I truly hope you're not being serious about all this, because it's coming off as pure ignorance.The irony...
And its absence is not. Straw man.How one feels about the absence of white space is 100% subjective.
Which is why I'm proposing an option, since it wouldn't be that great on smaller screens.I feel that'd make things feel even more cramp (looks like MS specifically defined how much space is supposed to be around the arrow icon), especially on my small 3.7" screen.
Which is why I'm proposing an option, since it wouldn't be that great on smaller screens.
Keep in mind that the customisability of the start screen (especially the new one) lessens the uniformity argument - it's one area where Microsoft is letting users have something close to free reign. The resolution is not a problem since the tiles will scale.I don't know, at that point you're messing into the uniformity of the UI. Not to mention, everyone's stuck with not only the size of the LCD but the resolution it displays (it being non changeable by the user). For something that does so little functionally it's a waste of space. Aesthetically it does a decent job, but again uniformity I think has the overriding priority.
Keep in mind that the customisability of the start screen (especially the new one) lessens the uniformity argument - it's one area where Microsoft is letting users have something close to free reign. The resolution is not a problem since the tiles will scale.
Because you can modify the home screen to be thinner and have a makeshift gutter (even now, you can arrange them one-wide) - the gutter isn't some terribly disruptive feature that makes the home screen look totally different. They can all ship with the gutter disabled.How is it lessened? The fact that they're making the tiles come in three sizes means there has to be a uniformity to support the new look across all devices. Having an optional gutter is gonna throw that new direction off balance. I think MS wants people to instantly recognize the version being run on the phone or to phase out the short stint of WP7.
Because you can modify the home screen to be thinner and have a makeshift gutter (even now, you can arrange them one-wide) - the gutter isn't some terribly disruptive feature that makes the home screen look totally different. They can all ship with the gutter disabled.
Microsoft's product will not be mistaken for another, gutter or not. Tossing WP7 behind them is an interesting theory, but hardly a strong enough case.
The ball's in your court. You can't complain an opt-in gutter breaks uniformity when something similar can already be achieved on stock WP8. You can customize WP8 to have empty space on either side, and tiles are tiles are tiles. The gutter does not break uniformity any more than the ability to dynamically rearrange tiles does.Huh? So you're saying there's no uniformity because one is allowed to create a make shift gutter?
Also, the tiles are the same size on EVERY size screen. All windows phones have the same screen resolution. Each tile uses the same amount of pixels on my titan as they do on a surround. The relative size of my tiles are larger than on the surround though.