I got a 1020 this evening and my first impressions are that it is awesome. its well built, thin, and light. I will take a ton of photos at a family gathering tomorrow ad will post! If you have any specific questions let me know and I'll do my best to answer them!View attachment 37752
If you have the money why not get the best there is even if you may not always use all the advanced features? Nokia has clearly advertised the 1020 for begginer and enthusiast photographers alike, thats why they made the Pro camera app so easy to use. The bottom line is that the 1020 is the king of camera phones, therefore it should be given that it can take better Auto shots than any other smartphone out there.
The 808 was more of a niche device not because of the camera but mainly because of the OS used, on the other hand the 1020 uses a modern phone OS that is way more mainstream than the 808 one was.
Okay, so serious question, do you think the 1020's camera is at least better than the 920?
if i upload to skydrive there is zero compression?
You must try to do shots without flash. With ISO 800- 3200, with expousure 1,2 and 4. Please, make the same shots with and witout flash.
sir. please send pictures without flash.. and if its possible use another flagship as reference.. like iphone 5 or galaxy S4 .. I really want to see that comparison..
btw thanks for posting those pictures.
Stop trolling!! The image captured with Lumia 1020 have less grain and noise than 808 PureView image. People are talking about grain and noise if full-res images without knowing that oversampling reduces noise and hence Nokia always asked to use 5 MP mode on 808 PureView or Lumia 1020. At 34 Mp Lumia 1020 sensor captures less noise than 808's sensor....Troll busted.
Comparison between 200% & 300% crops of Lumia 1020 and 808 full-resolution (34 MP) images. Lumia 1020 sems to capture less noise.