Good that you read the article, now read it again including the first two paragraphs and the one I quoted then you might understand the context of the entire article and why it's obvious that his article is speculating that Microsoft might kill off Window Phone.
I do understand the context. I'm sorry but the article simply does not say, nor does it make it "obvious" that Microsoft is looking to kill off Windows phone.
If you disagree, that's fine. I simply don't feel like it's appropriate for you to be stating your interpretation of an article as if it were fact. Especially when the article is from a well-known and trusted source for Microsoft news. Paul did not outright say Microsoft is killing Windows phone. He may have thought it - though I doubt that, too - but he definitely did not say it.
Have you read Daniel R.'s thoughts on the matter? If you haven't, give
his article a read. It's a well laid out, rational piece on what he thinks is going on. I'm firmly on the same camp.
Here's a rough summary of the points for Windows phone sticking around:
- Microsoft is heavily invested in Windows 10 Mobile
- Windows 10 Mobile is not just about phones, it's about tablets, too
- If Windows 10 Mobile disappears, the biggest point of Universal apps is completely undermined
- We know Microsoft is set to release new flagship devices soon
- Terry Myerson, the new guy in charge of Windows and devices (Windows phone) used to run the Windows Phone team
So no, I don't think Microsoft is going to kill off Windows phone any time soon. Reputable Microsoft watchers like Mary Jo Foley and Daniel Rubino agree. While it is possible to interpret Paul's (admittedly more alarmist) article in the way you have, I simply don't think that's what he meant.
And since you think Microsoft is only going to take 'tough choices' regarding Windows Phone let us know what you think those tough choices could be.
I'd be happy to. I think that if we were to apply the "tough choices" phrase to Windows phone (let's remember that we're making a small leap here, as Nadella did not directly indicate it even applied to this) it would refer mostly to manufacturing costs for hardware. Right now, the market is flooded with Lumia devices. That means several things that are unfavorable to Microsoft.
For one, it makes the market far less appealing for OEMs that may be considering Windows 10 Mobile as the OS for their new phones. It also means Microsoft itself has to carry the hardware for the platform, which involves a lot of design and manufacturing costs that no doubt hit their bottom line. Moreover, Nadella thinks of Microsoft as a "software and services" company. Hardware is more of a party piece for show casing what their software and services can do when at their very best. If that's the strategy going forward, it makes a lot more sense to cut down on the number of devices they bring to market. Google doesn't make 50 Nexus devices to show off what Android can be.