So, when I went to school this morning, I saw a friend of mine with this phone.
Well, while it's similar to the Lumia 800/900/920 and the awesome N9, I note that there are a couple of differences:
1. It doesn't have a polycarbonate body, so its back is replaceable. And, a polycarbonate body would be lighter than this.
2. It's heavier. You'd expect a phone with a smaller (1200 mAh) battery, a (crap) camera without OIS and a metal body to weigh lighter than the Lumia 900 (920 is heavier than this), right? No.
3. This comes from the same company that made a fantastic device that has a 4130 mAh battery (no, that isn't 413 mAh, read it correctly). Why they stooped so low, I don't know.
4. It's dual-SIM.
Well, while it's similar to the Lumia 800/900/920 and the awesome N9, I note that there are a couple of differences:
1. It doesn't have a polycarbonate body, so its back is replaceable. And, a polycarbonate body would be lighter than this.
2. It's heavier. You'd expect a phone with a smaller (1200 mAh) battery, a (crap) camera without OIS and a metal body to weigh lighter than the Lumia 900 (920 is heavier than this), right? No.
3. This comes from the same company that made a fantastic device that has a 4130 mAh battery (no, that isn't 413 mAh, read it correctly). Why they stooped so low, I don't know.
4. It's dual-SIM.
Just a little attempt at trolling 
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram