Greywolf1967
New member
- Nov 16, 2013
- 797
- 0
- 0
Probably would have chosen this over the Band if I had a choice, but Microsoft decided to take aim at the fitness market instead. Either they were intimidated by the impending Apple Watch launch, or felt that they couldn't really innovate more on what was being offered by other smart watches at the time.
Then again, it's been said the Band was more of a "proof of concept" unit and wan't expected to sell much. Seems like whoever was making the calls in the wearables area was a little off, as people seem to want this Moonraker watch and the Band has been much more popular than a quick "proof of concept" device.
I would say the Band was such a hot ticket item because Windows Phone did not have any options at the time. The Pebble only gained Windows Phone support because of the few who can code for our device. Pebble is not supporting our platform.
Microsoft can not be blind on this, nor can they claim "We didn't see a need". After the great response of the public to the Band, it should be a no brainer to rework a little code from the band to run on Moonraker.
Heck at the very least to reduce their own risk they could even run it as a Kickstarter and get the money up front to run a limited production, and see what demand is like.
It's pure gall on the part of the Clown who axed the project!!!!! Windows Phone / Smart Watch fans should unite and tell them they made a Mistake, and this should be fixed, and fixed now. We have waited far to long already !!!!