Microsoft's "This is an Xbox" ad campaign is confusing, and above all, poorly timed

fjtorres5591

Active member
May 16, 2023
372
96
28
Visit site
You own an XBOX console, right?
Then the ads aren't for you.
I own an XBOX. All of them, in fact.
The ads aren't for me.
We don't need cloud gaming to play our owned game libraries. (mine is only 930 and no, cloud can't play all of them. Yet. Because most I bought.)

But you're missing the point: people who *don't* own XBOX consoles can't play *any* XBOX games. If they want to play even one XBOX game, they have to buy a console? $300 is a big commitment for something they haven't done before. That they might not be able to afford.

So what's your prescription? Suck it up? That is Sony's answer. That is Nintendo's answer. Gaming is for those that can find $300. Plus $70 per game. If you don't like the game? Tough luck.

That is not the Microsoft answer.

Their answer is: jump in, the water is fine.
Get a free trial of GamePass.
Then go play on your phone. Or daddy's phone. Or mommy's.
Or a tablet.
Or a PC.
Or a FIRE TV stick. Preferably bundled with a controller. Today, that's about $80.
Don't like the game? Try another. You start out with hundreds of known good games. Shouldn't be hard to find something to like.

Microsoft is trying to grow the pool of gamers. They'll keep on selling consoles for those that can afford $500. They'll keep on selling games for PC for those that can afford $800-1200 (or more) gaming PCs. If you can afford those, nothing changes.

So why are some people out there so freaking offended that somebody who can't afford XBOX hardware is being presented with a path to play at least a few hundred XBOX games.

And, BTW, it might not be every XBOX game ever (no OVERLORD, no INVISIBLE WAR, no XMEN LEGENDS, etc) but it includes every HALO, every GEARS OF WAR, every FABLE, every ELDER SCROLLS, FORZA, CALL OF DUTY. No, not every game. But every genre is in there. There should be something to like. $100 to start. $20 a month to continue.

1- The ad campaign isn't for us. But it doesn't take anything from us.

2- The console gaming business is broken. The market is saturated and, worse, locked-in via the digital walled gardens. It is not growing. Add up the consoles: XBOX, Playstation, Nintendo, for each of the last 4 generations and what do you get? 250 million gamers per generation to be split between Sony, Nintendo, and MS. Games are getting more expensive, the price gets higher, the micro transactions and season passes are all over--and it is not enough. Studios are closing all over, projects are getting cancelled, open studios are reducing staff sizes. None of this is healthy.

3- Microsoft tried a dual SKU model with the SS as an entry model. But in today's economy, even $300 isn't low enough. They tried to do a streaming box but the numbers didn't add up. So they pivoted to cloud on TV and android and iOS and anything with an open browser. They are the only of the three console vendors actually trying to grow *gaming* instead of milking their locked-in installed base. And for this they get criticized?

Doesn't this strike anybody as elitist? Classist? Gaming as a niche only for those that can afford hundreds if not thousands of dollars just to get started? Not to bring in too much of the real world into the never-never land of gaming, but out there the divide between haves and have nots is "gifting" us with an age of populist ascendancy. And that isn't healthy either.

(Look up this book from 2019. Just the first few chapters might do. The digital edition is free. THE Economics of Discontent: From Failing Elites to The Rise of Populism. By Jean-Michel Paul. These are not healthy times.)

It might be a good idea to stop with the kneejerk defensiveness and actually look at what is going out there, the context that MS (and Sony and Nintendo and RA, and UBISOFT and *everybody* else looking to make a living in gaming) has to contend with.

Cut them a break folks; they're trying to grow the ecosystem so they can afford to keep the stockholders happy enough they let them do a HEXEN or a FALLOUT NEW VEGAS 2 or some new games other than new seasons for live service games and a new COD every year.

If the ad campaign works they can grow their ecosystem, the market for their games, the communities that play those games, and maybe convince their competitors that there is a better way than $1000 consoles and $100 games. Everybody can grow and win instead of fighting fruitless console wars instead of just gaming.

Instead of paranoid gripes, how about applauding MS for trying to align their stockholder money-grubbing interests with their gamers'?

Just a thought.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GraniteStateColin

GraniteStateColin

Active member
May 9, 2012
394
72
28
Visit site
I'm in an unusual place on this. I fundamentally agree with @fjtorres5591 on the targeting of the ads. However, I shifted from exclusively PC gaming to Xbox gaming for the comfort and family gathering of playing on the couch on Xbox. I love the idea of GamePass Ultimate, but won't get it until they offer a Family Plan so my kids can play THEIR games on THEIR Xboxes (MS seems to think there's only 1 Xbox per family, and maybe I'm rare in every kid having their own Xbox, but those one-time expenses are small over time compared with several monthly GamePass subscriptions).

So, I'm a physical Xbox gamer who wants to do GamePass, but MS doesn't offer the package that I need. I have several Windows PC's, but I no longer game on PC (but my son does both on his PC and his Xbox). I have a Galaxy phone and I've published mobile games back when Android was a #3 or #4 mobile (behind iOS and WebOS and the old Windows Mobile, before Windows Phone), but haven't played anything on phone more complex that Plants vs. Zombies since the days of Windows Phone, which at the time I expected MS to make into the ultimate gaming phone and portable gaming device with the built in Xbox features and Gamerscore connections.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
326,507
Messages
2,248,472
Members
428,507
Latest member
bijio