Lets put some prospective about the points you have made. Hopefully this will stop you from perpetuating such....drivel :winktongue::grincry:.
...as a revolution for mobile devices at least for me.
Being owner of a Lumia 1520 (which is supposed to bring the best experience with WP) for almost a year and really really really giving WP a try I switch back to my good old Nexus 4. The way MS is heading with Windows 10 does not bring improvement to the flaws that bother most about the current WP.
Hmm, really?
So a over hauled outlook app doesn't address a flaw in Windows Phone 8.x?
Where one can neither attach office documents but share a single office document via the office hub. Or multiple documents via a file picker, however such practises are just wrong - sharing secure links are best practice. This eliminates the issue of multiple file versions, emails with incorrect subject headers, badly scanned files that are not compressed but at an attrocious dpi level just to get the darn thing attached or just flung into the scanner with staples attached etc etc.
So the ability to reply to text messages in line without leaving what your doing, is not an improvement?
So the addition of being able to move the keyboard & snap to either left or right hand side of the screen - not an improvement?
So the incorporation of full office is not a benefit?
So the redesign of the setting screen doesn't address the gripe of most users?
I could go on forever.
First to mention is the ******** way of "multitasking" in combination with the push service. While the "resuming" message can be considered as a minor annoyance this WP "feature" sets some serious limitations for creators of apps. For example no VoIP softphone app is able to receive calls unless you have the phone unlocked and the app running in the foreground - very useful, lol. Oh right, the creator of the app supposed to run a cloud service to make use of push notifications. Saving battery life does not justify such drastic limitations.
Hmm ******** way of multi tasking, if your talking about the current system.
It is far from ********, what was ******** was the multi tasking in IOS until IOS 7.
I admit how the back stack was implemented in Windows Phone prior to implementation of swipe down to close / x button was just....:angry:.
In regards to the "resuming screen" that is down to poor code optimisation and you stated that "VOIP apps need to run in the foreground", care to give examples?
It is one thing to state something as a fact with evidence and another thing entirely when no evidence is given to support such a statement.
A developer does not need to run their own cloud services to support push notifications, an indie dev can tie into Microsoft Azure and enable such notifications via a IAP. For mobile app developers with deep pockets the cost is just standard business practice (of course games don't really need such notifications).
Also It is not MS's job to implement a background agent for a developer, if the developer is lazy than there is no fix for that.
Also there are lot of API's missing, even for basic things like getting the current signal strength or the amount of used data.
What are you referring to? Wi Fi or Cellular?
Again - be specific.
Apps operate in a secure container so they don't have access to functions / areas of the phones they have no business in touching.
Users request support for OpenVPN as well for many years in WP already which is ignored completely.
That is most likely coming with Windows 10, why?
Because they are trying get back into the enterprise market, which they abandoned trying to emulate apple with the consumer centric Wp7. Despite the fact Windows Mobile 6.x had way more "pull" in the enterprise segment. Also Windows 10 has been designed to win back the enterprise as Windows 8 was far too alien and had a "perceived steep" learning curve. The additional benefit it brings back the crowd who stayed away from 8 and stuck to Windows 7 / XP.
The recently announced attempts to make porting apps from Android or iOS to Windows 10 easier is just a marketing gag and will cause a hype only among some tech websites but ignored by app creators.
Everybody who had a piece of code that need to be ported from one platform to another knows it is not that easy as MS claims it is by simply uploading your .apk to a website for compatibility check and change a few lines of code - there you go! Of course users will now blame the app creators even more than before if they not release their apps for Windows since now it is "so easy". And those programmers who have already released apps for WP won't care about this anyway, tho these apps always lack a lot of features compared to their Android or iOS counterpart, often enough due to limitations of the operating system.
This even counts, ironically, for the OneDrive app.
A substantial solution for this ongoing dilemma would have been the native support of android apps, like Blackberry did. But that was just a wish and ignored as well.
I'm curious have
you used the tools??
Or just spewing what you have read on the internet, as I really doubt you have used them.
Yes, the Microsoft apps are better on other platforms which may appear as shock to you. But it is just business, pure & simple - as this way they ensure users are not using competing services. The catch 22 is, windows phone users felt like left in the dark - many of us wanted App Parity (myself included). However there are insane amount of changes that are coming to phones with Windows 10 - it is astonishing - so I am happy to wait. [Just look at the ShenZen WinHec documentation].
Also Blackberry used an older version of Android for emulation (it is now better than before but the damage has been done - just like the silliness with the blackberry playbook) and like with anything emulated you are going to need
a lot of resources for a smooth experience.
Pretty disappointing is also the lineup of Phones: besides the confusing numbering scheme of the Lumia devices it has also been an ongoing question (and demand) here in the forums for a new flagship phone since the 1520 disappeared in stores for a few months already without even the announcement of a successor.
A flagship is coming which has been reiterated time & time again.
But Some just don't get it, if you had a choice in releasing a flagship product that did nothing new or was different from the competition or didn't operate at it's full potential without an update. With thanks to US carriers may take an eternity to get pushed out. Would you release it?
The slow rollout of firmwares (that spreads over months) and OS updates (even for the TP) is pretty disappointing and unprofessional as well in combination with their missed timelines - delays delays delays.
No wonder Belfiore had to state the release of Win 10 for phones will be delayed and the desktop version to improve continously ( = permanent construction site).
Your ignorance here sadly speaks volumes, the delays are down to carrier testing & approval.
The technical preview for phones, was launched near on 6 months after the desktop preview. Designing, implementing & reiterating an o/s is not as simple as pressing a button or peeling an orange.
Windows 10 for Phones is not delayed, it is called a staggered release as a) it keeps them in the news cycle thereby attracting mind share b) reduces workload, they aren't machines but people like everyone else.
Sure, I would love them release everything in one full sweep but that is not realistic let alone practical; as the scale of task would be monstrous. Let me put it into prospective {not an exhaustive list}:
- Making sure you have enough supply for demand
- Staff trained & clued up for sale day
- Your distribution partners primed for launch so they can gear up their staff, if there are any changes in refund policies that they all are aware of such changes.
- Marketing events going live simultaneously with the unveil such as on the day promotions, if they are region specific, market or country specific etc etc
In regards to desktop windows being a construction site, remind me has Google ever finished those betas? :winktongue:
They (Microsoft) have said that Windows will always be updated and to think of it as Windows as Service (not a subscription service). Never the less
no software is final until it has been completely EOLed.
Same disappointment is the way Microsoft deals with hardware issues certain phones have: the 1520 was heavily plagued by touchscreen problems caused by hardware design faults as often enough you reading of users who had their display units replaced multiple times without improving it much.
Story continues with the Lumia 535 being released last year and every firmware update claims to fix the touchscreen issues while for the majority of users it doesn't. At least Microsoft now acknowledged the problem so there seems to be at least a learning curve.
You haven't been using Windows Phone long enough have you?
The 1520 was launched prior to the Nokia D & S division acquisition as such Microsoft can not do much about it. Then the re-org came and that would have put quite a lot of stuff on the back burner.
The touch screen issue on the 535 was down to reduction of cost for production. In order to hit low price points with a high spec, lower quality parts had to be used. Of course they could have ordered everything in bulk to reduce cost but means you have dead stock if you do not sell along with other fiscal ramifications.
About the unique platform for all devices Windows 10 claims to be I wonder what will happen to Windows RT?
No Insider App, no leaking screenshots of builds, no news or timelines except the vague, unpopular statement that it will later only receive "some" features of Windows 10. This platform seems abandoned already. Why does this remind me of WP 7?
RT is not dead, RT really stands for RUN TIME and in this context your referring to O/S that ran on a limited number of tablets. The Arm version of Windows is not dead either, just the Surface 2, Surface 1, Lumia 2520 along with others won't be progressing.
As callous as it sounds - it is easier to have an unified install base as opposed to supporting legacy especially at a time when coding hours are extremely priceless.
Overall I am pretty disappointed with development regarding mobile platforms like smartphone and tablet. It appears much more like a playground for MS to try out some new concepts than a solid platform for daily use especially in comparison with its competitors.
For desktop things are different and also with Windows 10 I feel being on the right track and for sure will upgrade to Windows 10, no doubt.
If your looking for a playground check out Microsoft research.
Solid platform?
So remaining stagnant and not innovating can be seen as a solid platform, interesting /s.
Remind us again how big is the install base of Windows compared to say OSX or Chrome O/S?
In regards to Windows 10 being on the right track, that is subjective as some love how Windows 8 worked and loath the changes in 10. Some are resistant to change whereas others are not so.
It is just like Marmite, you either love it or hate.
I for agree, that Windows 10 is on the right track and as whole, the way forward. But there are things that I do not agree with and have given feedback via the feedback app.