@MrWhiteman: While there's no way for me to know your exact lighting condition, I noticed that many of these indoor shots were taken at rather high ISO (800 and above), and slow shutter was used (1/10s or slower). This suggests that the lighting condition is not exactly ideal, even though to your eyes it may (deceptively) appear to be bright. Such conditions are generally quite challenging to any cameraphone or even point-and-shoot cameras, and the 930 is no exception.
I don't think the 930 is intended to be a low-light powerhouse (with its f/2.4 aperture) compared to the 920/925. But with the larger sensor and oversampling I don't think it is any worse either. I would like to see further comparisons between the 920 and 930, but it is important to ensure that the exposure time is well-controlled. The 920/925 has a stronger tendency to use low ISO and slow shutter speed, while the 1520/1020 had stronger tendency to use a faster shutter speed and higher ISO. That is just the default behaviour and doesn't really reflect the camera's true capabilities. For someone with steady hands, the 920/925's auto behaviour would be perfect and lead to higher quality images. For someone with shaky hands, the 920/925's may have more blur.
As pointed out by some, with the 930 you have the option to manually set a very slow shutter (possibly even more than 1s) thanks to the excellent OIS to keep your camera stable, and this will yield excellent result by keeping ISO low. Under such circumstances, Nijaz had shown that the 930 can produce even better lowlight pictures than the 920, despite having a smaller aperture.
One thing that I hope Nokia will provide, is the ability to save our pre-set custom settings. Proshot provides this functionality which is very useful. If I need to snap something quick, I have that custom setting pinned on my home screen for easy access.