Pics and Videos taken with your Lumia 930!

Ulwan25

New member
Aug 17, 2014
6
0
0
Visit site
920 low light performance was better (925, 928 as well), didn't have that frustrating flashing-weird purple color during night shots/videos. Hell, even my L1020 slightly have that problem and I don't know why (but do mind that 808PV is also got this critical problem which wasn't notified by Nokia).
 

timppa_k

New member
Apr 30, 2014
83
0
0
Visit site
Am I doing something wrong? I took some pictures today outside in the sunshine using 100 ISO and the pictures look over saturated?.... Is 100iso no good for outside on a bright day? Was just expecting more, everything looks over processed if that makes sense
76918d1408210558t-imageuploadedbywpcentral-forums1408210552.789530.jpg

The picture is absolutely too small (44kt !!!!!!!!) to say anything about the camera.
 
Last edited:

ianeb

New member
Jul 31, 2014
12
0
0
Visit site
Sorry guys I don't know how to upload the full size image!

If someone can give me an idea I'll upload full size!


Sent from my iPhone using WPCentral Forums
 

psiu_glen

New member
Dec 26, 2011
943
0
0
Visit site
Why are people saying lowlight perfrormance is not good?? Mine are fine,clean pretty noise free photos

Those look good, question about the line in the road in the last one though? What was he drinking?

As for low light, I just got an Icon (930 for Verizon in the US) and it definitely takes more work than my 928 did, especially in *extreme* low light situations. Think sleeping baby with a night light in the room. Have noticed a slight glow as well, have seen some speculation about sensor heating (yay quad core! Boo quad core! :p ) having an effect.

Of course, I haven't had much time in these first few few days to get a proper set of comparisons (well, a proper set without our messy bedroom involved and I know my wife would kill me for that lol).

So I'm working on it. Definitely better than the LG G3 from what I can tell so far though :D

(aperture for 92x series was f/2.0, 1520/930 is f/2.4, fwiw)
 

anon5658834

New member
Feb 4, 2013
253
0
0
Visit site
What do you mean what was he drinking?? The photos come out better using shutter speed than normal handheld night mode. These were 1.6 seconds and the line is a car going by a light streak
 

Julian Fera

New member
Aug 24, 2014
3
0
0
Visit site
Very good low light performance from the 930. Just takes a little more patience then with its predecessors, and 930 users get the added benefit of much cleaner and sharper daytime shots.
 

psiu_glen

New member
Dec 26, 2011
943
0
0
Visit site
What do you mean what was he drinking?? The photos come out better using shutter speed than normal handheld night mode. These were 1.6 seconds and the line is a car going by a light streak

No, LOL, the daylight one, the weird jagged painted line down the middle of the road ;)
 

Rodrigo Mendes

New member
Jul 9, 2013
676
0
0
Visit site
Very good low light performance from the 930. Just takes a little more patience then with its predecessors, and 930 users get the added benefit of much cleaner and sharper daytime shots.

Yeah, 920/25 performance at sunny situations are not very good. I think 930 have more day/night balance.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
326,597
Messages
2,248,613
Members
428,520
Latest member
bakron1