- Mar 19, 2014
- 59
- 0
- 0
In an interview with TechRadar Richard Yu said that he thought that QHD-resolutions are useless on a phone. He mentions three reasons: (1) we can't see the difference with our eyes (2) QHD screens will consume a lot more power (3) phones will be more expensive for the end-user.
I agree with Yu and I am glad that finally a company (or at least a man with authority in the field) testifies that those resolutions are useless. The difference is neglible, it drains your battery more quickly and it is more expensive. When I changed my 4.5" Lumia 920 (1280x768) temporarily for a 6" Lumia 1520 (1920x1080), I didn't notice a difference at the beginning. It's only when playing games or watching full HD movies that you see a noticeable difference, but not so in day-to-day usage.
I'd much rather see that companies worked on two things:
Battery life
Come on. I remember having a Nokia 3310 and it would honestly last ages. I realise that those phones could do far less, and - subsequently - were used only briefly. But it would be great if we could just be able to make three days with a slightly above average usage on any smartphone.
Screen quality (rather than resolution)
Screens have improved quite a lot over the years, but it seems that production for smaller screens is not set on rails quite well. Amoled-screens are used (though not all too frequently), but I'd like to see some OLED or plasma action.
I agree with Yu and I am glad that finally a company (or at least a man with authority in the field) testifies that those resolutions are useless. The difference is neglible, it drains your battery more quickly and it is more expensive. When I changed my 4.5" Lumia 920 (1280x768) temporarily for a 6" Lumia 1520 (1920x1080), I didn't notice a difference at the beginning. It's only when playing games or watching full HD movies that you see a noticeable difference, but not so in day-to-day usage.
I'd much rather see that companies worked on two things:
Battery life
Come on. I remember having a Nokia 3310 and it would honestly last ages. I realise that those phones could do far less, and - subsequently - were used only briefly. But it would be great if we could just be able to make three days with a slightly above average usage on any smartphone.
Screen quality (rather than resolution)
Screens have improved quite a lot over the years, but it seems that production for smaller screens is not set on rails quite well. Amoled-screens are used (though not all too frequently), but I'd like to see some OLED or plasma action.