altafmahmood
New member
- Jan 2, 2014
- 540
- 0
- 0
re: WPC 50K Post Challenge - You Ready?!
i don't want to be rude but science accepts facts by proving but philosophers explain facts by thinking. Quite a big difference I see is that nothing is accepted in science until it is proven, but for philosophers most of their theories are unproven.
Yes and that's the way most phoilosophers dismiss science.At the end of the day, a good philospher will have to have some backing for their thinking. If they don't then their thinking is flawed. That's not much different than science. Hence why I said good philosphy.
![]()
i don't want to be rude but science accepts facts by proving but philosophers explain facts by thinking. Quite a big difference I see is that nothing is accepted in science until it is proven, but for philosophers most of their theories are unproven.