fatclue_98
Retired Moderator
Don't force your children and or family members on bad tech that you're in love with....
When children start helping with the phone bill then they have a voice.
Don't force your children and or family members on bad tech that you're in love with....
I loved my 950XL, but it wouldn't connect properly with my Hands Free Link on my new Honda. The voice texting feature is a must for my work, so I had to switch to an iPhone 7. I still think my 950XL is the superior phone, but because I can't use it in my car, I have to continue to begrudgingly use the iPhone. If Microsoft and Honda could get their act together and make the phone pair properly for SMS via bluetooth, I would switch back in a heartbeat.
For me, a significant number of Microsoft employees, especially senior management including Nadella, would have to switch to using Windows Mobile (or whatever they call the telephony focused version of Windows) as their primary devices. Because if they won't use it, why should I?
Why not just use what works best for you?
Sent from mTalk on my SP4
I am. It's this little operating system called Android. Maybe you've heard of it. :winktongue: It's amazing. I can use basically everything from Microsoft plus pretty much everything from everyone else. Even my favorite local, non-chain burger joint has an app for Android (and iOS) which they use to implement their loyalty program. Not on Windows, though.
Oh, I still have a Lumia 640, and for a few months I swapped my SIM back in just to see how thing were. I still like Windows Mobile, but I just can't live with it long term given the app and services situation. I'll keep it around as long as it still gets updates though to keep an eye on things. I might even get nostalgic again and swap my SIM back in for a while.
But I won't invest any more in it. Neither in terms of software nor hardware. Not until I see some evidence that Microsoft actually believes in what they're making. After all, aren't Microsoft employees the perfect candidates for that product? They cover all the bases. They're consumers and enterprise users, presumably heavily invested in Microsoft software and services. Why wouldn't a Windows mobile solution be a first choice for them? And if it's not something they use, what motivation is there for them to make it better? You know, the whole "eating their own dogfood" situation.
Kind of makes me wonder about the Elite X3 now that I typed that. Is HP using that device much in their own internal enterprise?
So despite being perfectly happy with android, you'd switch back to windows 10 mobile, despite your troubles with apps, if everyone in MS used one.
That....doesn't sound true.
Its the burger joint app. Can't live without that. ������
I'd like to see the analytics on Microsoft employees and what phones they're using too.
Sent from mTalk on my SP4
I think that burger app is important as an example though. An android/iOS user simply generally doesn't need to worry about the fact that this single store they love to patronize has an app that gives them a benefit for their loyalty has an app and that app will work on their platform. This type of thing happens all the time every day. You may not need any apps or you may not care but someone out there cares and with Windows Phone you got a good chance it won't have an app. Companies invest in an app for their customers and if they can cover 99% of their customers with Android and iOS why invest money in Windows Phone (I am sorry "Windows Mobile)? They won't. They don't care about the future that maybe; or the fact that maybe in 20 years we won't even be using phones (or maybe we will)
That is in fact the app gap problem with Windows. Sure you got Snapchat and what not being an issue as well. But death by a thousand cuts in this case also hurts.
So despite being perfectly happy with android, you'd switch back to windows 10 mobile, despite your troubles with apps, if everyone in MS used one.
That....doesn't sound true.