It's more expensive in my country.
I never said that Chrome OS was better than Windows.
When you guys kept annoying me in another thread about Android's security, I just mentioned that if security is what matters to you most why do all of you use Windows and not Chrome OS?
I never said Chrome OS was the best though.
Obviously an OS won't lag after a clean install, but Windows 8 bogs down significantly after a while which shouldn't be the case.
Luckily according to the videos I'm seeing from Windows 10 it seems to have gotten much faster, go Microsoft. Haha.![]()
Obviously an OS won't lag after a clean install, but Windows 8 bogs down significantly after a while which shouldn't be the case.
In my experience, lagging or bogging-down systems are usually unique to that system and not pandemic to the operating system... except in very specific cases ("wow, I just installed Windows 8 on my 1ghz Pentium 4 with 512mb of RAM and it's a dog!")
You forgot the 32MB shared memory and the AC '97 sound card.
Amazing that people think what was released last week is the final Windows 10.
This is in reality "Windows 8.1 update 2" and resembles the final release probably as much as XP resembled Win7.
It is mainly for gathering feedback, something they should have been doing long before Windows 8 was finalized.
I can die satisfied in the knowledge that I have now read the most ******** few paragraphs on the internet.
There's a feedback app - if you don't like continuum (which is not yet even available/present) in the current technical preview build, then say it using that app. Windows 10 is far from being finished, good times ahead.
I don't like Windows 7 (aka Windows 10) in general. I believe the desktop environment is an overkill for most people. Simpler UIs will be adopted, big tablets with keyboards or simpler windowed environments like Chrome OS.
Windows 7 is too niche. Sinofsky was right.
I don't see any section in the feedback app to express that, and of course Microsoft won't listen to me.
I believe the desktop environment is an overkill for most people.
Oh no, it can get better. Stay tuned.
and it did,you were right!!![]()
![]()
I don't like Windows 7 (aka Windows 10) in general. I believe the desktop environment is an overkill for most people. Simpler UIs will be adopted, big tablets with keyboards or simpler windowed environments like Chrome OS.
Windows 7 is too niche. Sinofsky was right.
I don't see any section in the feedback app to express that, and of course Microsoft won't listen to me.
Currently, the desktop environment is way more productive than touch. People who are looking only for web surfing will be definitely fine with Chrome OS. However the OS has zero productivity.
So you're saying that 90% of PC and Mac users are using a niche OS paradigm. Apparently you see what these 90% people don't.
Leave a feedback to improve the feedback app.
IMO the complex Windows desktop is legacy, I see more and more people using tablets with keyboards or chromebooks.
You have to back your assertions with arguments. Why is the desktop more productive for most people? Managing windows make sense to fulfill the simple multi-tasking needs of the regular user, or is an overkill?
IMO the complex Windows desktop is legacy, I see more and more people using tablets with keyboards or chromebooks. You can also see that in web traffic stats.
A simpler OS with clean UI, optimized for the most common usage patterns has obvious advantages in productivity, for most people.
The trend has started, it's going to take a few years to complete. Microsoft saw it, that's why they pushed Windows 8.
So you're asking me for arguments, however you didn't tell nothing about your own "belief". Ok let's try.
1. Can you code as productive on touch as using a mouse/keyboard? No. (I'm coding every single day and I know what I'm talking about)
2. Is the software more customizable on touch than desktop? No.
3. Are the touch devices as powerful as the desktop is (for gaming, encoding, compiling)? ABSOLUTELY NO.
Fortunately Office is available for SOME touch devices, as well some Adobe stuff.
While using touch devices you're replacing your motor and reflex skills with your sight. I never look on the keyboard while I type, but I will have to spend my time looking on the on-screen keyboard to type. That's what I call productivity.
Now your turn.
When you add the keyboard, the tablet becomes an environment, not a touch device. The word "touch" involves touch itself, not adding the keyboard/mouse.
As I said above, for some people it's fine, but the touch doesn't increase the productivity.
Ask yourself what people use the touch devices for? Like iPads, Nexus tablets, Surface (ONLY touch, no keyboard). Is there some productivity? No. It's just fun: playing games, surfing web, social networks etc. No productivity almost (again, except Office and Adobe).
It has started when Apple announced the iPad and it still continues, yet touch didn't become more productive than mouse/keyboard.
tl;dr The touch will become more productive when you will have better results using sight instead of reflexes.