socialcarpet
Banned
That's kind of how I feel about Windows Phone also. I just still cannot understand why Microsoft put out such a low end OS on the Market when they did. They could have done just as well by creating a skin over WM to get by until they worked all the kinks out of Windows Phone. To top it off, they did a horrible job promoting it and getting it out to the market. I'm staying with Windows only because I figure I have nothing else to loose. I've been a WM user for many years and just stuck with it after my TP2 went bad and was upgraded.
I'll wait and see what happens after they actually release and ship WP8 devices before I make any final decisions.
So a skinned over buggy WM 6.5 wouldn't have been as low-end?
What makes WP7 "low-end" in your opinion? Aside from a few missing features, it's actually got all the capability most people want out of a smartphone. It certainly performs more responsively and more reliably than any of the 3 Android devices I've owned. My phone hasn't crashed once since I've owned it and I have only rebooted it 4 times since I've owned it (3 times because I had to to install and update and once just for the **** of it.)
Will WP8, which is going to look and act 90% the same out of the box is going to be high-end then?
I guess I'm missing the "low-end" part.
What's low-end? Is it the kernel? The parts you never see that you'd never even know about if you hadn't been told about them? Was it low-end before you ever knew there was an NT-kernel version coming?
If MS did a blind taste test and released a new phone tomorrow with 7.8 on it and the new home screen and threw in orientation lock and 2 or 3 of the most requested features and told everyone it was a new super deluxe NT kernel high-end super phone I guarantee you that you and almost everyone else would not know the damn difference.