- Dec 31, 2012
- 107
- 0
- 16
Haha, it's got nothing to do with people opposing change, that's just a lazy argument. XBM works ok in the scenario if you want to rent music on subscription. But, as you allude to yourself, the problem is that they extended this feature (that Zune already did) at the expense of breaking functionality for people who have already bought music. Why should these people pay a subscription to get the functionality (that used to work) to just allow them to listen to music they have already paid for?By far the best music concept there is, with some glitches that need to be ironed out. I don't understand all the moaning - it sounds like a 'change is not good' mentality, but I guess we all use these apps in different ways so some might find the glitches more severe than others. I suspect that if you have a vast music collection of your own prior to using xbox music then there might be more problems.
The glitches and comparatively poor interface (compared with its predecessor) are just an additional 'kick in the nuts', on top of having basic functionality removed or severely broken for the thousands of users who relied on it.
They could have just added the cloud stuff to Zune, enabled the drag and drop option to the storage and tidied it up a few other things. But the results of some self defeating internal politics have meant they are starting all over again. There's not really been any public acknowledgement on these issues and they are making the necessary updates at a snails pace. This is why people are (IMO rightfully) moaning!