While I'm fairly confident thus phone could replace a basic point and shoot, what about a "superzoom?"
My wife and I currently use our 920s as our "go-to" cameras, mainly because we always have them, but also because the quality is fine for digital sharing and basic prints like photo books. We also have a Nikon Coolpix P100 that we picked up 2.5 years ago, before our son was born.
The Coolpix has a smaller sensor than the 1020 (1/2.3 vs 1/1.5) and fewer megapixels (10 vs 41), but has a much more advanced lens - like all "superzoom" cameras, it's a compromise between the simplicity of a P&S and the versatility of a DSLR. Would the 1020 be a viable replacement? I know that in theory, the 1020 should capture a better image, but just how much of a difference in sensor size is there? Also, could the portability, convenience and lossless zoom (digital) really make up for the loss of the Nikons flexibility?
My wife and I currently use our 920s as our "go-to" cameras, mainly because we always have them, but also because the quality is fine for digital sharing and basic prints like photo books. We also have a Nikon Coolpix P100 that we picked up 2.5 years ago, before our son was born.
The Coolpix has a smaller sensor than the 1020 (1/2.3 vs 1/1.5) and fewer megapixels (10 vs 41), but has a much more advanced lens - like all "superzoom" cameras, it's a compromise between the simplicity of a P&S and the versatility of a DSLR. Would the 1020 be a viable replacement? I know that in theory, the 1020 should capture a better image, but just how much of a difference in sensor size is there? Also, could the portability, convenience and lossless zoom (digital) really make up for the loss of the Nikons flexibility?