Android Kitkat optimized for low end devices, time for MS to worry?

techiez

Member
Nov 3, 2012
832
0
16
Visit site
Android KitKat | Android Developers

Android 4.4 is designed to run fast, smooth, and responsively on a much broader range of devices than ever before — including on millions of entry-level devices around the world that have as little as 512MB RAM.

Lumia low end devices rules the low segment and helped WP market share to grow but now Google is looking to reclaim the territory. I think there is definitely some reason to worry for MS.
 

montsa007

Ambassador
Apr 10, 2013
3,036
0
0
Visit site
Does that low end stabilization make the OS polished/organized?
The answer is a two letter word, ending with an 'O', and to answer the question, "Should MS worry about it", I've already answered it, Hint - Two letter word starting with 'N'
 

gsquared

New member
Jun 26, 2011
1,365
0
0
Visit site
I wouldn't be worried if I were in their shoes. MSFT / Nokia has a big head start in this area. Running the OS w/ 512 RAM is n't that hard to achieve. Its the app developers that will struggle.
 

montsa007

Ambassador
Apr 10, 2013
3,036
0
0
Visit site
I wouldn't be worried if I were in their shoes. MSFT / Nokia has a big head start in this area. Running the OS w/ 512 RAM is n't that hard to achieve. Its the app developers that will struggle.

Congrats you won yourself
montsa007's "Shot in the head without leaving any bloodstains award"

You won yourself a complementary like on your post :).
 

techiez

Member
Nov 3, 2012
832
0
16
Visit site
Does that low end stabilization make the OS polished/organized?
The answer is a two letter word, ending with an 'O', and to answer the question, "Should MS worry about it", I've already answered it, Hint - Two letter word starting with 'N'

No doubt android is laggy and all that, but then this indicates that google recognizes the issue and can work towards resolving it. I'm not supporting android, I'll continue to own Nokia devices but I see the market share at risk down the line.
Why MS should worry about it is because it is still much behind android and was able to catch up somewhat due to breathing space it got in low end space, and the risk is real and not to acknowledge it would be foolishness
 

techiez

Member
Nov 3, 2012
832
0
16
Visit site
Its the app developers that will struggle.

Well the page mentions that google has released new APIs for developers as well, my point is simple, despite all its drawback that we WP users specially highlight, android is ruling the mobile OS space and if with steps like this if it is able to increase the gap further then it would definitely hurt the WP ecosystem.
 

inteller

Banned
Mar 31, 2012
2,528
2
0
Visit site
I read their various ways they plan to do this and like all POSIX based systems once again it is a clusterf smorgasbord of memory management techniques that the average developer isn't going to slog through. WP app development is soooo much easier for targeting different phones.... that's the part Google will never figure out.

Microsoft created te premium low end segment. Android existed in the low end segment by taking 4 yo phones that were once premium specs and just dropping the price and support for them
 

tgp

New member
Dec 1, 2012
4,519
0
0
Visit site
I never saw any numbers based on the low end devices, but I would imagine WP's total sales still pale in comparison to Android's even there. I'm not talking about performance or user experience, just total sales.
 

montsa007

Ambassador
Apr 10, 2013
3,036
0
0
Visit site
No doubt android is laggy and all that, but then this indicates that google recognizes the issue and can work towards resolving it. I'm not supporting android, I'll continue to own Nokia devices but I see the market share at risk down the line.
Why MS should worry about it is because it is still much behind android and was able to catch up somewhat due to breathing space it got in low end space, and the risk is real and not to acknowledge it would be foolishness

No matter what, that OS will never be smooth, unless it becomes closed source.
Since its open source, any developer can upload a buggy popular app that'll destroy the usage experience.
 

ohgood

New member
Aug 20, 2011
1,016
0
0
Visit site
I never saw any numbers based on the low end devices, but I would imagine WP's total sales still pale in comparison to Android's even there. I'm not talking about performance or user experience, just total sales.

I've seen a few posts now about how wp is doing "very well in low end devices" too, but again, no sales numbers.

If you find a credible source, please post it up aight ?
 

Chregu

New member
Feb 14, 2012
7,504
0
0
Visit site
I've seen a few posts now about how wp is doing "very well in low end devices" too, but again, no sales numbers.

If you find a credible source, please post it up aight ?

The Lumia 520 is by far the best selling phone. That means market share is based on the 520 to a high extent.

I can't look for any sources though, it's too early and I am on the WPC app.

Concerning the topic in general, at least analysts believe this is a really big thing for Android. It's in an article of the Verge of you want to look it up.
 

tgp

New member
Dec 1, 2012
4,519
0
0
Visit site
I've seen a few posts now about how wp is doing "very well in low end devices" too, but again, no sales numbers.

If you find a credible source, please post it up aight ?

I certainly will! I wish I could find sales numbers for low end WPs.

The Lumia 520 is by far the best selling phone. That means market share is based on the 520 to a high extent.

Agreed. My assumption that the 520/521 sales are still much lower than Android's low end is based on the fact that the sales numbers just released for Q3 2013 reported WP sales at 10.2 million, and Android at 204.4 million. This means that Android outsold WP 20 to 1. Let's say that of the Android sales, 10% were low end (I'm sure it's a lot higher than that, but I don't know what the ratio is). That's 20.4 million phones, or double WP's total sales, high and low end. That's why I believe that even though WP is doing relatively well in the low end market, it's likely nowhere close to Android's sales in the same market.

KitKat should help the performance of the low end phones, which will be a plus. In my experience though, Froyo & Gingerbread performed reasonably well on cheap Android prepaid phones as long as you didn't try to run anything too heavy.
 

ohgood

New member
Aug 20, 2011
1,016
0
0
Visit site
Does that low end stabilization make the OS polished/organized?
The answer is a two letter word, ending with an 'O', and to answer the question, "Should MS worry about it", I've already answered it, Hint - Two letter word starting with 'N'


it almost sounds like your bias-colored-glasses need a cleaning. why ?

because with wp's current marketshare, everything should be considered a threat, and promptly reacted to. should ms -not- worry about certain updates and upticks in market share, they could loose that 1-1.5% that currently holds them in 4th postion, barely ahead of a company with 'doa' stamped on every device shipped, and still very far from the podium.
 

rockstarzzz

New member
Apr 3, 2012
4,887
1
0
Visit site
No. Threats come to someone who has something to lose. MS has gained next to nothing in the market for it to worry of losing it!! 4% marketshare is nothing. If BB gets anything ground breaking it needs to worry. Android is not and will not be MS's competition for years to come. Even if MS makes phones for $50 running Windows Phone 8.1 - it will not break Android's nearly 80% marketshare in an instance.

So again No, MS should not worry about what Android does at the moment. Their realistic threat is only BB and a distant one is iPhone. Android will be a threat when WP gains 15-20% + marketshare. Not happening until 2016-2017.
 
Last edited:

ag1986

Banned
Jan 14, 2013
486
0
0
Visit site
No matter what, that OS will never be smooth, unless it becomes closed source.
Since its open source, any developer can upload a buggy popular app that'll destroy the usage experience.

Please explain how any app developed for closed-source is inherently smoother than an app developed for open-source platforms, or retract your argument.

As an example of how apps can be bad on closed-source, I present to you: Microsoft Windows.
 

hopmedic

Active member
Apr 27, 2011
5,231
0
36
Visit site
No. Time for MS to worry started three years ago when they launched a new ecosystem against two giants, and hasn't come close to stopping yet. The platform is catching on, but the time to relax is a long way off.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
322,911
Messages
2,242,885
Members
428,005
Latest member
COME ON WIN ANDROID (ADI)