16:9 vs 4:3

Kris Simundson

New member
Nov 12, 2012
403
0
0
Which do you prefer and why? I know on the Lumia 1020, a 16:9 means 5 + 34MP and a 4:3 means 5 +38MP, but how many feel that 16:9 offers so much more?

I personally find I like 16:9 over 4:3 just because of the extra you gain on the images.
 
Figured I'd add this for better comparison.






Sent from my Yellow Nokia Lumia 1020
 

Attachments

  • wp_ss_20131216_0002.jpg
    wp_ss_20131216_0002.jpg
    83.3 KB · Views: 25
  • wp_ss_20131216_0003.jpg
    wp_ss_20131216_0003.jpg
    78 KB · Views: 25
16:9!

Besides, it's much easier to end up cropping a 16:9 image to a 4:3 (or 21:9) image than the reverse, from my experience.

Besides, 16:9 seems more...natural.

Sent from my Lumia 620 using Tapatalk
 
16:9!

Besides, it's much easier to end up cropping a 16:9 image to a 4:3 (or 21:9) image than the reverse, from my experience.

Besides, 16:9 seems more...natural.

Sent from my Lumia 620 using Tapatalk

Grammatical error. Starting two paragraphs/sentences in a row with the same word


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well, most practical applications nowadays are better with 16:9, but if one bothers to see the extra effort of cropping (I dont when its 200 pics of my daughter), then I guess 4:3 is better :P
 
I don't know about you, but I prefer my images to contain more details, 16:9 is practically a cropped 4:3 anyway (at least I think so).

4:3
WP_20131227_15_03_17_Pro[1].jpg

16:9
WP_20131227_15_03_31_Pro[1].jpg

4:3 shows a bigger picture, not sure if any effect to picture quality...
But I generally prefer my photos to be in 4:3, since I can adjust it later
 
16:9 for most outdoor or inanimate object type shots, 4:3 for pics of the kids playing around and doing things. Do not like 16:9 for situations when I want to take a shot vertically.
 
Shooting in 16:9 seems more natural to me. Also fills the screen of my Lumia 1020. Sacrificing 4mp is a small price to pay in my opinion.
 
16:9 here too! :) The resulting photos fit your monitors and TVs properly nowadays, and well, real life is seen in a more widescreen aspect, so why not our photos?!! :)
 
Figured I'd add this for better comparison.

Sent from my Yellow Nokia Lumia 1020

The problem with these images as the lone example, is they are just one type of shot.
Scenery, which generally favors a horizontal layout rather than vertical can benefit from the 16:9, by getting that extra side to side detail (like the sun above), vs the extra sky or ground (which usually does not add much more to the image.)

4:3 has its benefits, like a few others have said, for kids or vertically oriented objects where you want more vertical detail and less horizontal focus.

I shoot in 16:9 the majority of the time, but when it comes to indoor shooting with the kids and family, it is always 4:3.
 
For a photography point of view I always use 4:3 whether it horizontally or vertically
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
335,486
Messages
2,258,489
Members
428,736
Latest member
biosteel