To each his own. I work in IT as well and have never had a problem finding an error code or a knowledge base article using Bing.
... Every time I did the Bing it on challenge google won in a landslide. It wasn't even close for more relevant results.
Yes, if you're searching general things like errors or kb articles or Adobe Flash downloads, Bing does fine. I use it sometimes if I'm searching with the customer's computer and the search default is Bing. Google shines if you need to search more obscure or unique issues, like inteller said. I also recall when Windows 8 RC was released. I had gotten the file name of the .iso download from a blog. I searched the file name with Bing, and I got a total of about 3 hits, none of which were relevant. One of them was in Dutch. Google, however, came up with the direct download link from MS in one of the first couple hits. Interestingly enough, a few days later Bing showed the same results as Google.
Autocomplete is what you hang you hat on, that's it? We call them "one-offs". Bing search crossfil and the results are there in the article. Like I said, much better results with Bing. You get the answer AND you get this
Code:[ [LIST] [*][B][URL="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/documentformat.openxml.office2010.excel.tabularslicercache.crossfilter.aspx"][COLOR=#0044cc]TabularSlicerCache.[B]CrossFilter[/B] property …[/COLOR][/URL][/B] [COLOR=#388222]msdn.microsoft.com › … › [/COLOR][URL="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/bb726434(v=office.12).aspx"][COLOR=#3366bb]Office client development[/COLOR][/URL][COLOR=#388222] › [/COLOR][URL="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj162978.aspx"][COLOR=#3366bb]Office 2013[/COLOR][/URL] [LIST] [*]Office ? [*]Version 2013 ? [*][URL="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/documentformat.openxml.office2010.excel.tabularslicercache.crossfilter(v=office.14).aspx"][COLOR=#0044cc]2010[/COLOR][/URL] [/LIST] [B]crossFilter[/B].Represents the following attribute in the schema: [B]crossFilter[/B] Code Syntax: [URL="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/Ee858488(v=office.15).aspx?cs-lang=csharp#code-snippet-1"][COLOR=#0044cc]C#[/COLOR][/URL] ? [URL="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/Ee858488(v=office.15).aspx?cs-lang=vb#code-snippet-1"][COLOR=#0044cc]VB[/COLOR][/URL] [SchemaAttrAttribute(, "crossFilter")] public EnumValue<SlicerCacheCrossFilterValues> CrossFilter { get; set; } /CODE] No formulas in the results with Google. [B]NONE.[/B] But if you are satisfied with autocomplete, stick with google. I'll have an answer already. Get your learn-on with [B]Bing[/B]. [/LIST][/QUOTE] Huh? Nothing like that in my Bing search results for "crossfil". Probably one of those US-only features? Anyway, I was looking for the JS crossfilter API. Not the Office development thing you mention. So basically Bing sent you off on the wrong track.
I don't know about US-Only. I'll leave that to your interpretation of its geographic predilection.Huh? Nothing like that in my Bing search results for "crossfil". Probably one of those US-only features?
Anyway, I was looking for the JS crossfilter API. Not the Office development thing you mention. So basically Bing sent you off on the wrong track.
I don't know about US-Only. I'll leave that to your interpretation of its geographic predilection.
On the results however, clearly, it is an example of its use of that API, in the Bing search results, I should say, Wolfram Alpha enhanced Bing search results. You do know what Wolfram Alpha is don't you?. Results in this article were obtained from a published article from msdn.microsoft.com.
But you auto-completely missed it.
It is a "high order" search result for advanced researchers and not necessarily for the majority of average searchers or for one relying on the implementation of a search engine's, "autocomplete" to prove value. Which is as I said before, is ok with me if that works for you. I'll stick with Bing for reasons already stated.
You're missing the point entirely; That is NOT the API I am looking for!
Crossfilter is an API created by Square and open-sourced. It is JS, not VB .NET/C# and it is also much much more commonly used than whatever Wolfram is returning.
Strangely enough, there is NO reference to this MSDN article in either a Bing search OR a Google Search. ONLY if I specify "crossfilter MSDN" do I see such results.
Next, your assertion regarding Wolfram is NOT true, as evidenced by this link: crossfilter - Wolfram|Alpha wherein I search Wolfram directly for 'crossfilter' and get ABSOLUTELY NO INPUT. So your "advanced researchers" nonsense is just that, defensive nonsense from an outmatched perspective.
To sum up, you were spouting unfounded assertions with absolutely no substance. Please do your research next time. HTH, HAND.
All this from autocomplete. And I'M defensive. lol.