- May 21, 2013
- 975
- 0
- 0
We're on a family plan on Verizon: 6 lines, 12GB shared. All of us are on the 2-year contracts. 5 Windows Phone, 1 Android (sister). One of the lines is up today, meaning that my sister can finally ditch her Android and get a Windows Phone. She chose the Lumia Icon, but when she went to the store, the salesman talked her into doing Edge instead. I told her to go back and cancel Edge because I thought it was a rip off. Admittedly, I was basing this on outdated information from last year. Apparently, they have sweetened the deal a little bit that makes it much more difficult to determine if it's worth it or not. However, I wasn't in the store with her and thus, couldn't look at all the fine print and whatnot, but it sounds like this:
2-year contract: $99 for the phone + $40 per month for service
Edge program: $38 ($23 for the phone + $40 for the service - $25 monthly discount), and apparently she got quite a few accessories at a subsidized rate.
So, the salesman's argument was that it's actually cheaper for her every month to do the Edge program and she gets additional benefits like she can upgrade early. After he explained the benefits of Edge, he was asked to explain the benefits of the 2-year contract and his response was "There are no benefits", which seems unlikely. So, what's the nitty gritty on this? Is a 2-year contract better or is Edge better? My skeptical take on the whole thing is that if a for-profit corporation is trying this hard to convince people to switch from 2-year contracts to Edge that they're doing so because it's good for them not because it's good for consumers. So, I told her not to do Edge and go with the 2-year contract instead, but she opted for Edge. Who is right?
2-year contract: $99 for the phone + $40 per month for service
Edge program: $38 ($23 for the phone + $40 for the service - $25 monthly discount), and apparently she got quite a few accessories at a subsidized rate.
So, the salesman's argument was that it's actually cheaper for her every month to do the Edge program and she gets additional benefits like she can upgrade early. After he explained the benefits of Edge, he was asked to explain the benefits of the 2-year contract and his response was "There are no benefits", which seems unlikely. So, what's the nitty gritty on this? Is a 2-year contract better or is Edge better? My skeptical take on the whole thing is that if a for-profit corporation is trying this hard to convince people to switch from 2-year contracts to Edge that they're doing so because it's good for them not because it's good for consumers. So, I told her not to do Edge and go with the 2-year contract instead, but she opted for Edge. Who is right?