Re: do you shoot in raw? what are the advantages in shooting in raw format
Yes I shot exclusively in RAW. Advantages ?
- You can change the white balance afterwards
- You can process what was captured by the sensor as you wish. This can allow for instance to underexpose a bit when shooting, then re-exposing differently the shadows and highlights. The result is that you'll have both highlights AND shadows preserved. Without RAW, a HDR is often required.
And I prove it. See below this first picture. It was shot, with a tripod, with a Nokia 808. HDR. So 3 shots.
Natural History Museum - HDR by
Massis__, on Flickr
Now this is a different one, I shot in August, with the 1020. Handheld, in RAW.
Natural History Museum (2) by
Massis__, on Flickr
Of course, RAW demands more time to process, you have to "develop" the RAW. This is a major "drawback" if you want to quickly share the picture (but you still have the JPG double captured with the DNG). The other drawback is the size of the RAW on a 32GB 1020. I had my Surface 2 with me during this summer holidays to load the pictures to the tablet from time to time.
A last example of what RAW allows, in terms of mastering shades and highlights:
Revelation by
Massis__, on Flickr