dakken
New member
- Jul 7, 2012
- 103
- 0
- 0
I think people here are misguidedly equating looks with quality, saying stuff like it looks cheap, doesnt look like a flagship, doesnt look expensive, looks bland and unispired ugliest phone ive ever seen. So i ask -why? Why does it look cheap? Because its poly? Same materials used in other Nokia flagships. Doesnt look expensive? Why? Because it doesnt use an inexpensive metal like. aluminum as a frame? Doesnt look like a flagship. Why? Because it doesnt have capacitive buttons like the BLU Win HD. lte a midrange phone? Doesnt look expensive. Why? Because it doesnt have an "I" in front of the name? Maybe I-lumia branding would make look expensive? Looks bland and uninspiring? Because its black and white and not colourful like previous lumias? And ugly i just plain dont get. What about this phone makes it ugly? I have no clue to that one.
Posted via the Windows Central App for Android
Posted via the Windows Central App for Android