I am not impressed with SP2 at all.
MS could have taken the opportunity of Haswell and make it the best tablet. I am not sure why, maybe they just do not have the experience and engineering power.
Surface Pro 2 is not a tablet... it's not an ultrabook.
I was hoping for a build with larger battery, smaller main board, or maybe even a larger screen. MS did nothing other than swapping out the CPU... If you wonder what I mean, just check out the difference between Sony Duo 11 and 13. I think Sony did the best job here exploring Haswell capabilities.
Battery is why the Surface Pro 2 (and 1) is heavy. Nothing else. The rest is super light.
Bigger battery, means heavier weight. There is no way around this, beside new battery technology, which we don't have yet.
Microsoft re-work the internal of the Surface Pro 2. They have improved circuitry to maximize performance without consuming more power, they are using LPDDR3 to provide DDR3 performance, and reduce power usage. They also made is dual channel, which isn't the case for the Surface Pro 1 (single channel), and all components inside are low powered. Its more than a CPU switch.
Making the device bigger, breaks the purpose, the main core view of the Surface Pro device. You want bigger? Get a 12/13inch convertible laptop. they are many out there. Also, bigger screen is NOT better. Higher pixel density is what we want. Bigger screen, makes text harder to read, and provides 0 additional work space. Plug any system on your 55inch TV... try and read text arm length from the TV. I wish you luck.
Haswell is great, but it is not enough. SP2 needs a redesign just like Surface 2, because the 1st Gen SP is not good enough. Compare to other OEMs, the original Surface Pro is heavier, warmer and last shorter, even taking into account the battery size. For instance, Ivy Bridge Dell XPS 12 lasts 5.5 hours on 47wh battery with larger screen and more ports, yet 1st Gen Surface Pro only does less than 4 hours with 42wh battery on a much smaller screen. The 1st Surface Pro is heavy for its size. It also has a huge motherboard, and it is impossible to repair/upgrade.
The laptops you mentioned are heavier, larger, larger battery and does not have a digitizer (consumes a lot of power continuously to operate).
All in all, other OEMs are beating MS in a lot of areas and MS needs to learn. Too bad, somehow MS thinks the engineering is good enough...
So it worked! Microsoft purpose of the Surface line was to wake up manufactures from producing an ultra cheap, "if it did not fall apart in the box when you opened it, it was a manufacture error", devices, provide 0 caring or proud-ness in their brand name, providing 0 innovations, and just no caring... producing half *** product at best.
So now we have more interesting products from OEMs, after all their *****'n (sorry, but it's true) and moaning from last year with the Surface/Surface Pro line. Good! See how competition works?
Sony Duo 13 has 47 wh battery and 13.3 inch screen with battery life of over 9 hours.
The Haswell Dell XPS 12 with 50 wh battery and 12.5 inch screen also lasts close to 9 hours.
You have free return for the Surface Pro 2. Return it, and get those.
To be honest, I would wait for a redesign with Broadwell. I am now more likely to get a bay trail one with 4GB ram, yet no one is making those...
Bailtrail! LOL!
I don't think you know what Atom class CPU is. You'll wish you got the Surface 2 powered by Tegra 4. You might say, "yea but the Surface 2 can't run x86 programs", and I'll say, in any case it won't run with Atom CPU... will take forever. A last gen Core 2 Duo will more powerful than Bailtrail in CPU performance. based on information I see from Bailtrail, my 5 year old laptop, powered by a Core 2 Duo 2.2GHz is more powerful... this is what I am using now.