RPG951S
New member
Lots of great ideas here - but I think the key is still to WIN the enterprise, and leverage that to get access to the consumer space. Going head-to-head with Apple/Google on the consumer side will be very tough - they are super entrenched and (as it has been shown) MS doesn't have anything big enough to provide a compelling differentiation, for consumers.
I think the the biggest misstep MS made is that are too "open". Leverage your success in one area to attack other areas. This is the key. Apple and google both do this. MS does not - office, skype, exchange are all completely "open". This is a mistake. It should be tiered - with windows devices always getting more/better/first support.
1) Mobile - Nadella is right, W10M has failed to establish a compelling third option. MS needs to change the game. MS was on the right path with continuum and "one device" - but the big flaw was it's not a complete replacement. Samsung DeX, Ipads and all the other "PC replacements" have died for the same reason; you still need a laptop/desktop.
The next "surface" device needs to truly "replace" the laptop/desktop in continuum mode.
Not 80%, not 90%, but 100%. It needs to have better performance than a core i3, run all x86 apps and peripherals. Multiple monitors. Add something like thunderbolt support (for external acceleration) and it would be incredible!
CShell and Windows on Arm is almost already there - a SD845 is already outperforming the core i3 - if MS has the will it can make this happen pretty easily. Imagine a folding surface phone, goes phone form to tablet. Add a $100 desktop dock or $150 laptop dock (but price them very competitively - the elite X3 lap-dock at $500 was a joke, at $150 it's seriously awesome). Or even a $500 desktop dock/laptop-dock with built-in CPU/GPU acceleration. Imagine. It would be incredible.
One device that is a phone, tablet, laptop and desktop. Add performance when needed with external acceleration. This would be SO compelling - impossible to ignore, especially for the enterprise customer.
2) Leverage the enterprise domination in Exchange/Mail/AD to "prefer" windows devices. I think the biggest mistake for MS was allowing exchange activesync for non-windows devices. There should ALWAYS be a compelling reason to choose an MS device in the enterprise space when it comes to mail/calendar/exchange.
MS should have stuck non-windows devices with a lower level of integration like POP/IMAP - functional but not great.
The key here is build differentiation for windows devices.
3) Same for office - keep the MSOffice "light" mobile products for non-windows. Give windows devices support for FULL MSoffice. Same for skype, azure, xbox, and all other MS divisions. Figure out a way to leverage your lines!
The combination of these three things will springbox MS back into the game.
The "next gen" device needs to be there - but it needs support to change the game.
I think the the biggest misstep MS made is that are too "open". Leverage your success in one area to attack other areas. This is the key. Apple and google both do this. MS does not - office, skype, exchange are all completely "open". This is a mistake. It should be tiered - with windows devices always getting more/better/first support.
1) Mobile - Nadella is right, W10M has failed to establish a compelling third option. MS needs to change the game. MS was on the right path with continuum and "one device" - but the big flaw was it's not a complete replacement. Samsung DeX, Ipads and all the other "PC replacements" have died for the same reason; you still need a laptop/desktop.
The next "surface" device needs to truly "replace" the laptop/desktop in continuum mode.
Not 80%, not 90%, but 100%. It needs to have better performance than a core i3, run all x86 apps and peripherals. Multiple monitors. Add something like thunderbolt support (for external acceleration) and it would be incredible!
CShell and Windows on Arm is almost already there - a SD845 is already outperforming the core i3 - if MS has the will it can make this happen pretty easily. Imagine a folding surface phone, goes phone form to tablet. Add a $100 desktop dock or $150 laptop dock (but price them very competitively - the elite X3 lap-dock at $500 was a joke, at $150 it's seriously awesome). Or even a $500 desktop dock/laptop-dock with built-in CPU/GPU acceleration. Imagine. It would be incredible.
One device that is a phone, tablet, laptop and desktop. Add performance when needed with external acceleration. This would be SO compelling - impossible to ignore, especially for the enterprise customer.
2) Leverage the enterprise domination in Exchange/Mail/AD to "prefer" windows devices. I think the biggest mistake for MS was allowing exchange activesync for non-windows devices. There should ALWAYS be a compelling reason to choose an MS device in the enterprise space when it comes to mail/calendar/exchange.
MS should have stuck non-windows devices with a lower level of integration like POP/IMAP - functional but not great.
The key here is build differentiation for windows devices.
3) Same for office - keep the MSOffice "light" mobile products for non-windows. Give windows devices support for FULL MSoffice. Same for skype, azure, xbox, and all other MS divisions. Figure out a way to leverage your lines!
The combination of these three things will springbox MS back into the game.
The "next gen" device needs to be there - but it needs support to change the game.