Jaime Rivera from pocketnow.com, thinks Nokia is the biggest loser of 2012!

Status
Not open for further replies.
When one of your major features fails to deliver - ahem, daylight photos - people are going to take notice.
Purely an over-aggressive noise processing algorithm, which has been enhanced already to provide significantly sharper photos and is in today's over the air update.
 
Jaime craves attention. Comments like this get him the kinds of YOUTUBE audience he needs for ratings and money. He's not the only one doing this. ZDNet has an entire wing devoted to manufacturing ******ed stories about Microsoft. They have to. Otherwise they would shrink to the size of a postage stamp.
 
Jaime craves attention. Comments like this get him the kinds of YOUTUBE audience he needs for ratings and money. He's not the only one doing this. ZDNet has an entire wing devoted to manufacturing ******ed stories about Microsoft. They have to. Otherwise they would shrink to the size of a postage stamp.

Moving on up! to the East side! lol love your avatar
 
Yeah, it's a shame that sites do that... especially ZDNet. I look at true journalists like Mary Jo Foley and Ed Bott who do actual research and present factual information (and clearly state the difference between the facts and their opinions), and I wonder how they survive in a sea full of morons like Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Even when I don't agree with the opinions, as long as facts are presented honestly and fairly, I can respect and read your work. I've been following MJ and Ed for about 20 years now. I read AKH for about a month before I accepted he was an idiot and moved on, because I was tired of being annoyed after reading every article.

One of the reasons I love coming to WPCentral though... the guys work hard to be actual journalists. I realize the news gets very Nokia-centric at times, but that's strictly because Nokia is the one making all the news. I appreciate their perspectives too, and if any of them swing by and read this thread, I hope they know I thank them for their work.
 
I'm not clicking that link. I'm not going to give his piece any more hits than it deserves. Guys like that don't care about factual information or have a valid opinion, and it doesn't matter how balanced or un balanced their stuff is - they are going for the hits. And the easiest way to do that is to spout the most inflammatory stuff possible. Like Siegler's garbage on the Surface RT where the last picture shows it in the trash can. If no one clicked their links, their writing fails.

It's that simple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.