I just can't see how it's good business to have such limited presence at the top end of the market. I know the volume comes from the low end, I just think the high end builds the whole halo effect that enriches the whole platform.
I have the 920 and whilst I still like it I'm itching to get some far more potent hardware.
What have Nokia's high end releases been since the 920.
The 925: Same SOC, less storage, arguably worse 4.5 screen, minutely improved camera, no wireless charging.
The 1020: Same SOC, same storage, arguably worse 4.5 screen, admittedly great camera, no wireless charging. Way more expensive and as such a bit niche.
The 1520: Hugely improved SOC, same storage, great full HD 6inch screen, wireless charging, great 20mp camera. Unfortunately, just way too big and as such Niche. Also completely castrated in USA.
The Icon: Hugely improved SOC, same storage, great full HD 5 inch screen, wireless charging, great 20mp camera.
In all, a great device which was then limited to less than half of 1 countries market.
In effect I'd argue that Nokia has not released a flagship device since Nov 2012 that wasn't just a reworked 920 or something targeted at tiny subset of the market (1520&Icon).
I still think the 930 looks good, the problem is that I think the market has moved on and what would've looked frankly amazing in NOV 13 now looks a little more pedestrian and indeed it's still not out.
Now lets add insult to injury, it looks like the damn X2 will make it out the door within a couple of week of it's announcement.
Microsoft, I find you're lack of faith (in WP) disturbing.