Are you kidding me?
I agree on the leaving part due to Nokia phones being terminated.
But the rest? Nope.
First people left w 8.1 because of the end ok Nokia (I agree with you)
Nowadays, people left w10m because the major apps do not exist in w10m
Snapchat
Pokemon go
Facebook (there is FB in wp......but its crap and it hasn't seen an update since 1986)
Pinterest
Tinder
LinkedIn (exists but like FB, it doesn't have an update in years
Example: In my country, most bank apps do not even exist in w10m....!
In my country, the majority of TV apps that people like (tv shows p. ex. that have their own apps) are only for Android and Apple.
I can play lottery or check my highway tolls or provide my electricity counter to the power company in my country using an android or apple app.....with w10m I can't do any of this.
This impacts people's daily life. They can't do regular daily stuff with a w10m.
Just to name a few.
This is why people drifted away! Android and Apple phones make their lives easier!
Do you think the average user left w10m because he saw Nadella on TV saying "mobile is not a priority"??
Come on......the average user (real people....not geeks like us) sees football, news and soaps on TV.....not Nadella presentations and conferences!
They don't even have a clue on who the hell Nadella or Donna are!!
The current facebook app is a direct port of the ios facebook app, and its very recent.
I'm sure there's a revised version of the claim that might make logical sense, but number of apps = percentage of marketshare just doesn't match the marketshare of win10mobile over time.
" They can't do regular daily stuff with a w10m." - That's a bit OTT. You know people can and do survive without smartphones, and most of everything can be done by a browser right? Including banking and paying tolls. You make it sound like people can't eat or breathe without apps! What really happens without apps is things take a second or two longer, for the most part. Indeed what happens without tinder, is you actually have a good time and find love, haha! Roughly 3/4 of the global population has no form of computer.
Interesting side note- heavy internet use has been associated with suicide risk, in several major studies. Take note FB junkies, it ain't making you happier.
I'm not saying that windows 10 mobile isn't missing apps some people might want or find convenient. Certainly banking apps do add a slight bit of extra convenience to ones life, over loading a browser page.
All I am saying is that there are more UWP apps right now, that there have ever been historically, and less marketshare that there has ever been historically, so a simple 1 to 1 correlation there makes no logical sense.
And yes, I think MS's intentional lack of support put off some users, the fall of nokia too as a windows provider, and especially business confidence such as carriers, who sell the things. Business confidence is extremely trust orientated, it functions similar to stock rise and fall. Carrier support or not, is life or death to phones.
I also think tech has become very fashion oriented. That its become like, IDK, shoes or jewelry. Microsoft tablets are "cool" but their phones aren't. I just don't think it can really be put down to apps, or even the widely touted "user experience". Most people have never ever used a windows 10 mobile, myself included. I used UWP all the time, but I've never even touched a windows 10 mobile device. Most people never used a blackberry. Many android users never really gave ios a go, and vice versa. I'm sure there is no study anywhere showing people using smartphones are happier with their lives. How you use a tool, defines its actual outcomes, not the tool itself.
People have grown a little entrenched in their worlds too. Not that they need apps per se, but they grow used to their ecosystems, their UIs, doing things a certain way. The slight conveniences and comforts. Like people fall out of the habit, of say, walking places because of cars and get fat, things like FB and tinder, don't really have psychological rave reviews, but people use them because they "are easy".
For me, windows on small mobile devices other than slates -I'm not planning on going near that till windows on arm, and bot Cortana integration. Till MS's strategies ferment a bit. Should be in about a year when windows on mobile devices (outside of tablets, for which it is excellent), becomes interesting to me. Then I think there may be some exciting and useful paradigm breaking propositions.
I personally think these days, windows 10 mobile is probably more suited to a smartwatch OS. As a carrier for future superapps like Cortana. Its lightweight, low resources, and not real windows 10. Perfect for little smart devices. And if it came in that form, with the new Cortana platform - that'd interest me, save me carrying around a glass slab and twiddling with a touch screen all day.
In a phone, yeah, I wouldn't touch it. But I'm not super interested in any other phones either. Looking forward to something more natural, less like a a glass brick I have to cart around.
"apps = marketshare"?
If that was true, amazon tablets wouldn't be killing it, in the budget tablet sector.
If that was true ChromeOS wouldn't be popular in schools
Apple would be a bigger seller, by volume than they are, given they are extremely close to android in app volume, and have better software quality overall.
Windows 10M and bb10 never would have had any appreciable marketshare.
There are "missing apps", on the platform. Yes. Functionally I would say banking is a major one. Pokémon go or niche messaging programs.....not so much
Windows store is looking great to me, as a tablet and desktop user, compared to its paultry offerings two years ago. It's a great deal better, and empirically the app count is a lot higher.
There's all those complex human variables that business analysts and marketers look to, habits, cultural influences, marketing exposure, spending, what their peers do, and so on. Which in a way, goes back _partly_ to "is it cool".
If we are all 100% honest, if all smartphones were wiped from the face of reality tomorrow, we'd probably be as much better off, as we are disadvantaged.
There have been studies showing people under 25 would rather _electrocute themselves_ than spend half an hour bored, with nothing to do. You can be smarter with tech than that, but tech can also be a crutch, something that weakens a person, as with obesity, fast food, and the automobile.