a5cent
New member
- Nov 3, 2011
- 6,622
- 0
- 0
I believe Microsoft "thinking like it did about the desktop" is the reason it was so late to ditch WinMo and finally switch to Windows Phone.
Actually, it was worse than that. Microsoft wasn't thinking about WinMo at all! Microsoft was totally surprised by the iPhone. After Microsoft realized their mistake the mobile division's leader got fired and they transferred a couple hundred people, many of them star-engineers, to get the Windows Phone 7 effort under way as fast as possible. Even for Microsoft, a new OS is a big undertaking. You can't do it in a couple of months, which is why consumers didn't see it until 2010. Microsoft was simply caught flat footed.
I'm guessing that open source code is easier to update which is why Linux had so many revisions.
Well, the Linux distros use a different Linux kernel in most cases.
By your logic, Windows is even more ancient than OS X, since the NT kernel has been around since Win2000, which is older than the first OS X.
The windows kernel gets updated too! The only difference is Microsoft doesn't stick a publicly disclosed version number on it. For Windows Vista Microsoft undertook a huge effort to componentize the underpinnings of Windows, including the kernel and MinWin. Only thanks to that effort was Microsoft able to give us Windows on ARM, which is also what we are getting on WP8. The reasons Vista failed are the exact same reasons Windows 7 succeeded and it is a large part of what is making Windows RT possible... Windows has the "shiniest" kernel of them all.
