You two are apparently completely misunderstanding me. Obviously they CAN enforce it, however, its a pretty big d*ck move to to say "not only are we not giving you an app, but you're not allowed to use other apps, so don't use our services". I don't even know where you two think they "owe" it to us, that's not even close to what I'm saying, I never said owing us anything. I'm sure you guys wouldn't be as ok with Google only putting their products on their own stuff, Microsoft pulling every app from other platforms, and Apple getting rid of iTunes from Windows. I mean, they've got every right to, right? It's their stuff after all! Like I said, they don't HAVE to, but its a big middle finger to say "yeah, youre not even good enough to unofficially be on our platform!". There's ways that they can allow it to happen and it will be at very little cost to them. They don't have to maintain any app, they don't have to be responsible for any breach, they don't have to do anything, but they're blocking it anyways. Maybe in your world we should just expect companies to only do things that benefit them and should not do things that could benefit them and their potential customers, but I definitely don't see it that way.
@tgp so you're telling me that if you were Snapchat PR, you would say "I don't care if you can't afford another phone, youre gonna have to buy another one!" Lol ok. Because apparently no one has ever decided to start using Snapchat after they get their phone. Whether Snapchat is there or not is obviously on the mind of people when they're buying a phone.