resle
New member
Done with Windows Mobile, moving to Android
I was a DOS guy in the early 90s when Mac users laughed at me, an early adopter of all Windows versions (Win XP 64 bit included (!)) - and someone who chose a Windows Server based infrastructure for his own company in spite of equally attractive free alternatives.
I suppose all of the above makes me quite a Microsoft/Windows loyalist.
So of course, I had a Windows CE phone, a Windows Phone 7, a couple Windows 8.1 phones, and in the end a Lumia Icon running Windows Mobile 10. And when it comes to smartphones, even when I briefly slipped into the iPhone territory, the home screen was enough to contain all the apps I needed. Yes, I need that few. The so called "App gap" has never existed for me on Windows Phone.
Except...
..except I expected those few apps, those few, few "mainstream" apps that one could find on Windows Phone, to be regularly maintained and updated.
But that didn't happen. Quality slipped, versions lagged badly behind, and even Microsoft's own apps deteriorated or were treated at 2nd class compared to their equivalents on iOS ad Android.
And the phones...
The 920 was a brick twice as thick as other similarly equipped Android phones, not to mention the iPhone. The Icon, as beautiful as it is, it's another thick and rough thing. Later phones just looked hideous and even cheaper in build, lacking physical buttons, sporting unbelievably slow cameras, etc.
I live in China: I bought this nondescript Xiaomi android phone just for a test ride. It was all but my intention, to actually end up using it as my main phone. In a week I found out that Whatsapp and Alipay (a local payment app) had 10 times the features of their Windows counterpart. And they just worked. No crashes! No freezing! Also, the battery didn't drain in half a day. The phone remained cool all the time and, uhm, it was a piece of paper compared to my Icon. And the camera.... I forgot one could just point and shoot with a smartphone. And there are apps that allow me to browse my Windows LAN like I was on a pc... which my Windows Phone never allowed me to do properly. And... and... and.... ..... and all of this costed me less than half the Icon.
So I decided to tolerate that Android looks like an inconsistent mess of UI elements, and pick it over Windows Mobile.
After all I did it for 25 years on desktop Windows, and to those who pushed me to MacOS because "all looked so consistent", I offered the same perspective that today drives me to Android: right, it looks crappy, but - you know - it lets me do all I want, the way I want it.
I hope things will change at some point. The potential is definitely there.
r.
ps: someone please tell me why MS spent 26 billions on Linkedin rather than invest in the makers of the top rated IOS and Android apps out there to port and maintain a UWP version ...
I was a DOS guy in the early 90s when Mac users laughed at me, an early adopter of all Windows versions (Win XP 64 bit included (!)) - and someone who chose a Windows Server based infrastructure for his own company in spite of equally attractive free alternatives.
I suppose all of the above makes me quite a Microsoft/Windows loyalist.
So of course, I had a Windows CE phone, a Windows Phone 7, a couple Windows 8.1 phones, and in the end a Lumia Icon running Windows Mobile 10. And when it comes to smartphones, even when I briefly slipped into the iPhone territory, the home screen was enough to contain all the apps I needed. Yes, I need that few. The so called "App gap" has never existed for me on Windows Phone.
Except...
..except I expected those few apps, those few, few "mainstream" apps that one could find on Windows Phone, to be regularly maintained and updated.
But that didn't happen. Quality slipped, versions lagged badly behind, and even Microsoft's own apps deteriorated or were treated at 2nd class compared to their equivalents on iOS ad Android.
And the phones...
The 920 was a brick twice as thick as other similarly equipped Android phones, not to mention the iPhone. The Icon, as beautiful as it is, it's another thick and rough thing. Later phones just looked hideous and even cheaper in build, lacking physical buttons, sporting unbelievably slow cameras, etc.
I live in China: I bought this nondescript Xiaomi android phone just for a test ride. It was all but my intention, to actually end up using it as my main phone. In a week I found out that Whatsapp and Alipay (a local payment app) had 10 times the features of their Windows counterpart. And they just worked. No crashes! No freezing! Also, the battery didn't drain in half a day. The phone remained cool all the time and, uhm, it was a piece of paper compared to my Icon. And the camera.... I forgot one could just point and shoot with a smartphone. And there are apps that allow me to browse my Windows LAN like I was on a pc... which my Windows Phone never allowed me to do properly. And... and... and.... ..... and all of this costed me less than half the Icon.
So I decided to tolerate that Android looks like an inconsistent mess of UI elements, and pick it over Windows Mobile.
After all I did it for 25 years on desktop Windows, and to those who pushed me to MacOS because "all looked so consistent", I offered the same perspective that today drives me to Android: right, it looks crappy, but - you know - it lets me do all I want, the way I want it.
I hope things will change at some point. The potential is definitely there.
r.
ps: someone please tell me why MS spent 26 billions on Linkedin rather than invest in the makers of the top rated IOS and Android apps out there to port and maintain a UWP version ...