cracgor
New member
- Feb 21, 2013
- 666
- 0
- 0
I'm not disputing your main point. I'm not aware of the old Windows Mobile ever achieving 65% market share either.
However, THAT GRAPH MAKES MY EYES HURT!
Android runs on much more than just phones, so comparing to the iPhone seems useless. Microsoft and Blackberry are company names, but Symbian is an OS, and only one of Nokia's many mobile OS offerings, so shouldn't we be comparing to Nokia instead? Finally, the term "iPhone" refers to a smartphone brand name (like Lumia) and isn't similar to anything else on that graph.
Calling that an apples to oranges comparison is far too kind. Whoever made that graph was far too confused to be trusted with anything related to computer technology, consumer electronics, or statistics. The only place a graph like that should be on display is in a trash bin. Sorry...off topic... but had to be said...
Here's a far superior alternative:
View attachment 127280
(source = gartner)
2013 looks like the turn around year when WindowsPhone outpaced Bada, Symbian, and Blackberry. Plus, look at that clearly positive slope.