WellingtonW
New member
Interesting and odd results. Some times the 3D is much worse on the 640 sometimes better. I wonder is WP10 not optimised yet for the 640. Very buggy on mine.
Another review here...
Head to head: Lumia 640 vs Lumia 650
Pro 650
The 650 has 16GB internal space and WP10 takes up more internal space.
Much better screen, slimmer, lighter, camera might be tweaked for better still photos.
better front camera
Much better quality build and case.
Pro 640
The 650, faster CPU, GPU
1080p video
compass
Bigger battery, longer battery life.
A lot cheaper.
Got link?
From what I know, 650 is coming to Cricket which AT&T owns. However, Cricket does not unlock phones and in their firmware they make ot so it does not even work with a different AT&T style SIM.
Cricket will be getting 650 in April.
Pro 650
The 650 has 16GB internal space and WP10 takes up more internal space.
Much better screen, slimmer, lighter, camera might be tweaked for better still photos.
better front camera
Much better quality build and case.
Pro 640
The 650, faster CPU, GPU
1080p video
compass
Bigger battery, longer battery life.
A lot cheaper.
I wonder is WP10 not optimised yet for the 640. Very buggy on mine.
...Mind you I enrolled in Insider, updated all the way, hard rest, no restore backup. Clean install and manual setup.
according to the note, the 640 has a slightly better gpu, but a slightly worse cpu.
You can unlock without turning the phone on right? How did you unbrand?
My 640 wasn't buggy at all on 10586.164 (Release Ring) when I drove it for almost a month (I'm back on 1520.3 w/ Official W10M).
Mind you I enrolled in Insider, updated all the way, hard rest, no restore backup. Clean install and manual setup.
I don't believe the 212 is faster than the 400. I reserve judgement till I see some benchmarks. They are very careful to be vague about the performance of these.