ajstockdale
New member
Hey Everybody!
I've passed the torch to Phil for representing WinMo full time this year, but you and I both know that WinMo is an old friend for me. So while I get the OS, I'm more curious about where you think things are and where they're going, specifically:
- Do you use something like sense or touchwiz? Are the NECESSARY for WinMo these days
- Do you miss WinMo standard? Does anybody use it anymore?
- Do you think Microsoft is behind? What do they need to do to catch up?
- What's one feature you'd steal from webOS? From Android?
- Do you use something like sense or touchwiz? Are the NECESSARY for WinMo these days
I do sometimes use Sense. I have a Sony X1, which is (out of the box), a WM6.1 device, and doesn't come with Sense, Touchwiz, or even 6.5's Titanium. Something I like about Windows Mobile is that you do have the flexibility and power to change...my phone has run Sense, and then I got bored of that. I'm currently using 6.5's stock Titanium interface, and I'm really happy with it. It's nice that you're able to get bored with something, move on, try something else.
I don't think that Sense or Touchwiz is necessary at all for 6.5 devices. It's nice to see some of the deeper areas of Windows Mobile tidied up by OEMs, but if anything, I'd prefer if OEMs tidied up the deeper areas and left the front end as is. Titanium is pretty nice, and very intuitive.
- Do you miss WinMo standard? Does anybody use it anymore?
I've never used it, and never would. I think it's definately...gone. I sort of see the point - a small candybar phone with the functionality of a Windows phone, but even that is questionable, as all the good stuff was always on Professional. Standard was kind of like the second-class version, which is unfortunate, as there was a point to it. I think touch is kind of killing it off now. Even blackberry shaped devices like HP's Glisten with their small screens and big front-facing keyboards are getting touchscreens now.
- Do you think Microsoft is behind? What do they need to do to catch up?
Yes and no. Microsoft is certainly behind in the 'wow' factor and the instant visual satisfaction. There are parts of Windows Mobile that undoubtedly look awful, fair enough. But functionally, it's definately up there as a proper smartphone...in contrast, I'd term the iPhone more of a widget-phone. It's got the underlying hardware power and the capability, but it's there for lots of little things. Windows Mobile definately has the functionality that makes it a smartphone, that you can do something serious on. And I think that's its downfall - it's too 'serious', as it has come from an enterprise background, and now MS are pushing it into consumers. It's not a quick or easy transition.
I'm in the fairly fortunate position of having a Windows 6.5 Phone with Exchange 2010, for personal use. And it's absolutely fantastic, I just wish more people could see it...Exchange really makes the platform. Other platforms have Exchange, but Windows Mobile does it awesome and best...stuff like SMS syncing is *really* useful. Everything I send or recieve all ends up in the same place. It makes viewing and searching so easy. I think if you're using Exchange and any other smartphone platform except Windows Mobile...you should be slapped. It's that good.
I think if even half the rumours about WM7 are true, they'll have done their part playing catchup...I regard WM at the moment as definately par if not better than any other mobile platform for how it works...they just need to make it more attractive to the masses.
- What's one feature you'd steal from webOS? From Android?
From webOS, it's an easy one...the multitasking interface. webOS, Android and WM all functionally multitask excellently, but by far webOS has the best interface for doing it. From Android, I don't really know what I'd steal, if anything? Maybe the unquantifiable 'cool'