lol what? Are you serious?
This has already been said. HP is a hardware company. Software, such as WebOS, has NEVER been relevant to its financial health. Microsoft is a software company. WP will one day be its bread and butter. Its do or die.Let me put it a bit differently--what's the difference between WebOS and WP7? Everyone said there's no way HP will kill WebOS, they've invested too much money in it, every serious tech company needs to be a player in the mobile marketplace, it's too soon. They've killed WebOS, and they're doing better for it. Period. End of story.
I respectfully disagree. Microsoft was a atom of a company that it is now when Windows 1.0 was released. Do I think its a more important product than WP? Yes. Do I think Microsoft pitched it harder? No. Microsoft has bent over more pitching all its modern products.Also I disagree that Microsoft is pitching WP harder then anything before. Proof:
Microsoft Windows 1.0 with Steve Ballmer (1986) - YouTube
The Xbox had traction in the marketplace. WP7 simply doesn't. Projects can lose money if there's prospects for long-term growth, like the Xbox. But that's what I've been asking is, what is the prospect for long-term growth? Or even short-term growth?
Crawl-walk-run only works if you figure out how to crawl. People are saying "Microsoft can't afford to give up on mobile!" What if they can, or don't have a choice? What if even Android is in trouble, given Apple's absurd dominance? Android has a whole new generation of tablets out, and they're dead in the water, not selling. The iPad is absolutely king. It's not a tablet market, it's an iPad market.
most people who buy an Xbox is going to sign up for the service anyway.
if that is true $99 is A better deal.