Travis Flenker
New member
Again, comparing the value for price against Android is not realistic. Android makers pump out way more so they get better parts prices and faster supply for 1st gen parts. It never was at parity when comparing same spec per $ + current gen parts release with Android vs WP. Android was always less $ and launched new gen faster, why would this change for the Cerulean Moment?
In terms of Windows on Mobile you have to look at MSRP on release. Show me a Continuum capable phone that was less $$$ ON RELEASE. I want to see that as I missed that unicorn sighting.
Here's my list of Continuum enabled devices and price at launch. Did I miss any?
- HP Elite X3 - MSRP on release = ~$800
- Lumia 950 XL - MSRP on release = ~$650
- Acer Liquid Jade Primo - MSRP on release = ~$650
- Lumia 950 - MSRP on release = ~$550
- Alcatel Idol 4S Windows - MSRP on release = ~$470
- Mouse Computer Madosma Q601 - MSRP ~$450
- NuAns Neo - MSRP on release = ~$420
- Funker W6.0 Pro2 - MSRP on release = ~$410
- Coship Moly PCphone - MSRP on release = N/A as it never released, but based on Madosma and Funker rebadgings it would have been ~$400 or more
- Cerulean Moment - MSRP on release = ~$300
I'm not comparing against Android. I'm comparing against the 950.
Why would we compare prices at launch day? I don't know of any instance of anything where in the real world someone would make a purchasing decision based on that.
I know there are economies of scale etc that factor in, but the point is that today you can buy a better Windows phone for about the same price. Sure, the 950/XL may be out of production, but I'm guessing there are far more than 3-4k of them new and available for sale.