- Dec 14, 2014
- 471
- 0
- 0
I have a decision to make. Today I was very disappointed to receive my old Band back from MS service. Included with the un-repaired and unusable Band was the following explanation:
"Dear Microsoft customer:
We have received the Microsoft Band that you returned for for which you requested service. After careful inspection, we found excessive damage to the device that is unrelated to a defect in materials or workmanship. This type of damage is not eligible for warranty service, as it is expressly excluded from the coverage of the Limited Warranty you \accepted when you purchased the device."
It goes on to explain that the damage could be due to misuse, impact, or failure to follow instructions in the manual, Damage due to exposure to liquids, and/or torn or missing parts.
To say that I am disappointed and angry would be an understatement. At no time have I ever subjected my Band to any of those conditions. It has been worn on a daily basis as a wearable fitness device, and has never been dropped, received an "impact", or been subjected to any liquid other than my own sweat. The only "torn or missing part" is the disintegrated battery covers. Despite its intended use as a wearable fitness device, MS has determined that it has "excessive damage".
As many of the regulars here on the forum may know, I have been a staunch supporter and evangelist for the Band, and have often defended it. Now I must decide whether or not to continue to support MS and the Band by purchasing a new version 1, or the new version 2 when it is released. It is not as if the Band were my only fitness device. I have my Garmin Fenix 3, my Basis Peak, Mio Fuse, and Garmin VivoFit. Of these, the Fenix 3 and the MS Band are the only two devices which I use on a continual, daily basis. I have a lot of time and effort invested in the Band eco-system, and I intend to do my best not to make a hasty decision about this, but my initial reaction is to stick with companies who understand what a wearable fitness device really is.
"Dear Microsoft customer:
We have received the Microsoft Band that you returned for for which you requested service. After careful inspection, we found excessive damage to the device that is unrelated to a defect in materials or workmanship. This type of damage is not eligible for warranty service, as it is expressly excluded from the coverage of the Limited Warranty you \accepted when you purchased the device."
It goes on to explain that the damage could be due to misuse, impact, or failure to follow instructions in the manual, Damage due to exposure to liquids, and/or torn or missing parts.
To say that I am disappointed and angry would be an understatement. At no time have I ever subjected my Band to any of those conditions. It has been worn on a daily basis as a wearable fitness device, and has never been dropped, received an "impact", or been subjected to any liquid other than my own sweat. The only "torn or missing part" is the disintegrated battery covers. Despite its intended use as a wearable fitness device, MS has determined that it has "excessive damage".
As many of the regulars here on the forum may know, I have been a staunch supporter and evangelist for the Band, and have often defended it. Now I must decide whether or not to continue to support MS and the Band by purchasing a new version 1, or the new version 2 when it is released. It is not as if the Band were my only fitness device. I have my Garmin Fenix 3, my Basis Peak, Mio Fuse, and Garmin VivoFit. Of these, the Fenix 3 and the MS Band are the only two devices which I use on a continual, daily basis. I have a lot of time and effort invested in the Band eco-system, and I intend to do my best not to make a hasty decision about this, but my initial reaction is to stick with companies who understand what a wearable fitness device really is.