jdballard
New member
It's only ridiculous to someone who irrationally hates Google.
Android OEM's are allowed to make their products unique, and they take advantage of that. It's all part of why Android has been so successful(and windows phone has not)
Be different, not the same.
You don't have to irrationally hate Google to think that the amount of customization allowed in Android is a bad idea. I should be able to pick up any Android find and find what I want in settings, but I can't. That, IMHO, should be standard. If you want to provide a top-level settings option for a manufacturer to dump all their stuff in (with subcategories), great, but that's not what happens. Drives me nuts when I'm trying to help my step-mom (via phone) change a setting on her Android and the menus aren't the same as on mine. As far as skins/launchers, that customization isn't as bad, but it still creates this weird ecosystem that has to introduce a ton of issues for support and development.
And the customization isn't why Windows phone failed. It's because Microsoft got to market way too late, well after the iPhone and Android had taken a hold of the market and they just couldn't get momentum because the market had spoken. Without that momentum, no one wanted to build apps for a stagnant platform. It didn't help they ended up rewriting (not enhancing) the OS three times: 7, 8 and 10, and that resulted in issues with the OS, which probably killed some of that momentum.
I always thought that Windows phone struck a nice balance between customization and standards, at least from the user's perspective, with the live tiles being a huge part of that.