It doesn't particularly matter if you think they are easy alternatives. What anyone thinks has nothing to do with the fact that it is not a consistent design. This is not an opinion statement.
I never said that my opinion makes a fact not a fact. I acknowledged that there was a difference, and then I merely pointed out that to me it in some cases makes sense.
Now, ask yourself why you'd bother pointing out the fact that the design is inconsistent. Let's say I point out that the Lumia 950 has a battery. Is there a point to that? Surely there must be a context within which we can find a point to mentioning it. Same with mentioning the inconsistency. So I would say that the logical thing to do is to first figure out if it is correct that the design is inconsistent (it is, we verified that), because if it isn't, then the point is moot, and the second thing to do is to then move on and talk about whether or not it matters that there is a difference. And at that point we really are back to talking about opinion.
So just as you having implied yours, I stated mine. I thought it was crystal clear that that's what I was doing.
Try Word and then try the messaging app. To select the whole word in one it takes a double tap and to select the whole word in the other it takes a single tap. Both are stock Microsoft apps.
Yepp, that appears to be the case. (btw, you don't have to post pictures of the above since it's impossible to know if you actually single- or double-tapped to select)
So I guess what we have here is a difference of opinion regarding just how 'severe' the 'issue' of design inconsistencies are. To me it doesn't matter all that much if in the one app I have to double-tap and most others (that I've checked so far) I single tap, and if the settings are found in one out of two places. It's simply not a big enough issue for me to feel it needs (or choose the words) "serious polishing". To me, "serious polishing" would probably be far more (to me) significant issues.
Except... Microsoft handles all of their support first hand but Windows phone. Windows phone was handled through them and now that has changed concurrently with Microsoft admitting to not making any more Lumia phones and also admitting to cancel other planned phones. I know first hand as my 950 is not my first Lumia. Microsoft gave me a new phone with ease when I had my 1520. No issues at all. Handing it off is a clear sign it's done with it.
Which phones were canceled and when?
And you and I are obviously viewing outsourcing support very differently. You call it a clear sign, and I don't. For example, just because MS might not release future Lumia phones does not mean that a) other vendors won't or that b) MS won't release phones with different branding but still Win10Mobile.
A lot of these Microsoft apps exist on other platforms in better states. Whether it's the app or the OS the problem is exclusive to Windows phones.
If you say so. I honestly can't tell. My last phone was an Android and it was horrible when I ditched it. Now, I could blame the OS, I could blame Google, or I could blame the phone. I suppose the basic question is if it matters who you blame and what you say (?). I think it does matter.
In my case the phone got a whopping two updates over several years. It was a G2X on T-Mobile, made by LG. The last update made it into a horrible sluggish mess. With newly included stock apps such as Google+ and once I'd installed Facebook it was essentially unusable. Google+ couldn't be uninstalled so I had to nuke everything and rebuild the earlier version. Then it worked for another year or two and then it just turned to crap. So, who do I blame? Well, I could blame Google, but honestly it wasn't their fault I think. The blame goes to a) LG for not supporting the phone better, and for it eventually just not performing well, and b) to me for updating the OS (the first time). So me ditching Android is something I didn't do because of Google, or because the OS was crap. In fact, I'm sure the OS on new powerful phones is probably pretty great.
So, here I'd apply the same line of thinking. We can't really blame an OS maker for poorly programmed apps by third-parties. Fine, you can come to the conclusion that one shouldn't pick the mobile OS because third party producers aren't putting in enough effort. I can understand that argument, but that's a different thing from complaining about the OS itself, and it matters if users actually
don't end up with those poorly designed apps.
So again, in
my case, I haven't stumbled upon third-party apps with tremendous problems, and neither stock apps with severe problems. This is probably because I tend to use few third-party apps. But if I were to listen to some views here, and especially considering how they are phrased, I could possibly have been convinced
not to get a 950 because my impression would
wrongly have been that I wouldn't have been happy with the phone and OS.
Words matter.