jeremyshaw
New member
- Oct 21, 2011
- 602
- 1
- 0
TN panels are extremely obvious. The colors invert at angle. This is a very good screen and obviously isn't TN. Black levels are pretty good for an LCD as well. Not sure what you're smoking.
Keep the juvenile attacks at home.
Also, a good thing you have *never* heard of a wide angle polarizer film (and no... not the silly kind people tape to their laptops to keep out shoulder creeps). The sort Sony uses on some of their Vaio laptops (SE) and ASUS uses on some of their Ultrabooks.
Of course, the fact that you are not even directly answering my points ("black levels are very good for a LCD..." really? LCD? It has worse black levels than my old W2408h TN panel "LCD Panel"! Compared to an actual PVA panel (245t, in my case), it's still worse!
Did I ever say it was not a PVA panel, or are you just looking to pick a fight based on...?

Or you could deny you are trying to pick a fight by not even directly answering anything said in this post, lol.
EDIT:
TN panels are extremely obvious. The colors invert at angle. This is a very good screen and obviously isn't TN. Black levels are pretty good for a phone LCD as well. Not sure what you're smoking. I'm sure it's PVA. That said, not all PVA panels are equal. I'm sure PVA panels in huge $2000 TVs are nicer.
really... I guess way it's too late to inform you of what multidomain pixel rendering even means,
