So I disagree with what I see from Android's approach to giving the phone computer-like resources. You don't throw more RAM and CPU at an ugly, inefficient OS...
Its sub par and Android and IOS are better. I use them all every day and you don't have to be a fan of anything to see what's obvious. I'm way more productive on those devices than on WP and the hardware is clearly superior. That's what matters. Looks are secondary.
Saying an OS doesn't need more than its given doesn't make the hardware less bad, so I'm wondering when people will stop using that excuse. Nexus s was the reference phone for Android and it is single core with 512 Mb RAM. Android does not "need" uber specs to run, but why would you "upgrade" to a phone whose hardware is at best marginally better than what yo have. To support the cause? Or maybe cause wave one devices were crippled in design to accommodate a beta OS which didn't have support for relatively commodity hardware when it was released?
Thx but nothx. Even apple new better than to just *** a few hundred MHz clock speed. People with a clue know there's more to processor quality than raw cock speed and dual cored have not so obvious benefits that you don't get with a single core.
Nevermind those GPUs Re terrible by today's standards.
And I was urged to post mostly by the disgusting last sentence in your post. I wish you would, too.
Sent from my HD7 using Board Express
To you, everything about WP7 is sub par. Even though Pocket_Fuzz detailed how he uses different functions on his phone at the same time you dismiss it and claim android and ios are better, flawless and make the world a better place. And seeing as you say buying a WP7 isnt intelligent, why do you use it?
Android and ios are sub par to me because they dont have Xbox live, native access to Skydrive or Office but you dont see me going to those fan sites and moaning about it all day long.
Its sub par and Android and IOS are better. I use them all every day and you don't have to be a fan of anything to see what's obvious. I'm way more productive on those devices than on WP and the hardware is clearly superior. That's what matters. Looks are secondary.
Saying an OS doesn't need more than its given doesn't make the hardware less bad
so I'm wondering when people will stop using that excuse.
Nexus s was the reference phone for Android and it is single core with 512 Mb RAM. Android does not "need" uber specs to run
, but why would you "upgrade" to a phone whose hardware is at best marginally better than what yo have. To support the cause? Or maybe cause wave one devices were crippled in design to accommodate a beta OS which didn't have support for relatively commodity hardware when it was released?
Thx but nothx.
1. Those OSes have capabilities I need that WP doesn't. The inability to send video out from the phone being one of them. Lack of BT file transfer and notnhaving Sony's frame grabber app for video.Could you elaborate on how you are way more productive? On both the iPhone and especially Android, I find I am less productive throughout my day as I have to navigate through numerous screens and apps to get what I want. On WP it's mostly there on the start screen.
But, it's never said in as an attack. It's qualifying WP current need (lack of) for big memory and dual-cores.
I guess it'll be when people stop creating problems for the platform that don't exist.
I, and many others who have used Android disagree with this, flat out. Android is renowned for lag and system reboots.
Or maybe it's simply to add required lifting power that the previous handsets missed.
Be seeing you.![]()
For all the haters: The Nokia Lumia 800: It’s business-ready | Mobile Industry Review
1.The inability to send video out from the phone being one of them.
Lack of BT file transfer and notnhaving Sony's frame grabber app for video.
2. I think that bears defining what an attack is. It is defined oddly on certain forums.
3. I forgot the problems don't exist because WorksForMe™
4. If I said I and many others who used WP agree its subpar
its reknown for looking like a chalk board with nice handwriting on bit yous take that as seriously as I took that statement from you.
Some Android handsets were underclocked 800 MHz and ran fine. G2, e.g.
5. Cause a gyro is lifting power. And a FFC... lol. No Its cause the OS obviously didn't support the HW.
WebOS was true multitasking. Drained the battery like a mofo, but you could run as many apps as you wanted. Card metaphor for managing them was sweet too. Mango's switching is like an early beta version of WebOS' cards. Even though I have an HTC Trophy (which works for most stuff), I keep my Palm Pre2 around in WiFi mode for listening to podcasts. Mango is *better* for listening to podcasts than nodo, but still nowhere near as good as webos. Dr. Podder and Stitcher rock on there. At least Stitcher is coming to WP7.It has a LOT to do with their multitasking functionality. Part of Apple's UI design guides require a back button in the application design, which generally makes Android and iOS multitasking very similar*. Per application. Not across the entire user experience.
If the government really wanted data easily, they should of banned VPNs alltogether, lol. But going after RIM = RIM not even in the books for where I work.
* relative to WP7. Dunno about WebOS.
We can all constructively criticise the platform, but the 3 of you are just out to bang on about how it's not like the Droid. It's just the same old **** that people are tired with.