Windows 10 mobile 10586 Vs 14295 question

[Matt1971]

So I've got 2 1520's. One on the 218 build and the other on Redstone (14295)

General performance is roughly the same. Standard windows phone apps installed with the OS all perform the same

However there are truly massive differences in some other apps in terms of opening times. All apps are in internal memory

Specifically app deals, win store deals, remember to drink, money tracker pro, trakter, and our beloved windows central 10 app

On 14295 they're all almost instant to open, however on 218(and 164) they're about 5-7 secs to open

Just wondering what you think. Is that the whole point of the Redstone branch to improve performance? Do you find opening some apps on 10586 slow?

Thoughts appreciated

Matt

 

[Maurizio Troso]

So I've got 2 1520's. One on the 218 build and the other on Redstone (14295)

General performance is roughly the same. Standard windows phone apps installed with the OS all perform the same

However there are truly massive differences in some other apps in terms of opening times. All apps are in internal memory

Specifically app deals, win store deals, remember to drink, money tracker pro, trakter, and our beloved windows central 10 app

On 14295 they're all almost instant to open, however on 218(and 164) they're about 5-7 secs to open

Just wondering what you think. Is that the whole point of the Redstone branch to improve performance? Do you find opening some apps on 10586 slow?

Thoughts appreciated

Matt

I got 650 with Redstone and latest firmware update. No performance difference than previous Threshold. Only more funcs, like Call Recorder (warning, app presence in o.s. may depends on country laws)
Surely a bettery improvement than before